It is often thought that the increase in juvenile crime can be attributed to violence in the media. What do you think is the reason for a growth in the rate of juvenile crime? What solutions can you offer to deal with this situation?
Today, most people would accept that juvenile delinquency has become rampant, and the causes of this problem have aroused considerable public debate. Although this can be attributed to some reasons, including media, several solutions can be utilized to address it.
Some reasons can be cited to explain the emergence of the increase rate of juvenile crime. First, since the majority of young adults now have an excessive exposure to questionable content, they are inclined to settle conflicts by violence, which is the premise that they will commit crimes in the future. In fact, many young criminals have admitted that their behavior have been affected because of violent games and movies, which implies those contents are responsible for their aggressiveness. Second, by attacking the adolescent, drug dealers will be the culprit for the youth engaging in extrajudicial activities. In accordance with copious scientific evidence, human brain is susceptible to the negative consequences of drugs, so the lust of breaking laws after getting high will emerge and take over their mind, urging them to offend.
Nevertheless, this issue can be alleviated, provided that some reasonable steps are taken. First, by censoring products containing violation such as movies, games or books, the youth will have less access to those morbid contents. That means, they have more time and opportunities to expose to more wholesome entertainments and hobbies, such as educational programs or sports. Second, law enforcement should take steps to tighten controls on drug distribution. For example, the increase in charge and drug tracking punishment would act as a deterrent for criminals involving drugs and controlled substances.
In conclusion, the violence in movie, games or on television program and drugs tracking are blamed for compromising the young adults, eventually lead to crimes. Hence, some interventions such as censorship for inappropriate contents and higher penalties for drug related activities are the most effective solutions to tackle this problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-11 | vantran2297 | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-29 | sana23 | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-06 | ochirvaani | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-27 | linh_pham0503 | 61 | view |
| 2018-04-09 | rutbah amin | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that eventually all jobs will be done by artificial intelligent robots. What is your opinion? 78
- It is said that the fast pace of our everyday life as a direct result of the rapid development of telecommunications technology and travel industry has negative effects on individuals nations and globe To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- A few major languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is this a positive or a negative development? 84
- In the future, it seems more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planet to live, such as Mars. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
- Some people believe that the range of technology available to individuals today is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, nevertheless, second, so, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6050955414 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93238093805 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611464968153 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5148833483 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.714285714 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201232249784 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752276791709 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931395771193 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124125932839 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526953184506 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.