Sending criminals to prison is not the best method of dealing with them. Education and job training are better ways to help them. Do you agree or disagree?
Today, incarceration has aroused considerable public debate about its effectiveness. Although many people have considered it as one of the primary forms of punishment for offenders, I advocate the view that providing education and job training is a better way.
There is no denying that imprisoning criminals, particularly, ones who convicted of felonies, can ensure the safety of the society and act as a deterrent to would-be criminals. However, in the long-term, this practice shows some demerits. First, to maintain and run all the jails, the government needs to invest a large amount of money in facilities and security, which triggers some financial burdens to the national budget, specially, in developing countries Second, still there is a high chance of re-offence after offenders are released. In fact, due to the hatred caused by being condemned in confinements, along with meeting the others those are like-minded, dangerous criminal gangs can be formed within prisons, which heightens the recidivism rates and harms the society in the future.
From my perspective, poverty and the lack of education are underlying causes of delinquency, so offering education and vocational training is the best method in attempt to help offenders become better citizens. By enlightening criminals, education plays an important role in changing their attitude and helping them distinguish between right and wrong, the chance of re-offence will be possibly reduced. More importantly, many convicts will have opportunity to achieve normal career after being free, thanks to job training programs. That means, they can make a living and have a normal life, with no reason to do evil deeds again.
In conclusion, to deal with wrong doers, I believe that the government should provide them with education and occupational skills training in lieu of using imprisonment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | camp.vandna@gmail.com | 80 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | vantran2297 | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-24 | enassar | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-20 | Mohammad Rahvar | 56 | view |
| 2018-10-05 | nazirsumra | 78 | view |
- The technology development has affected social relationships from person to person Do the negative aspects of this trend outweigh the positive aspects 50
- Scientist say that in the future, humanity will speak the same language. Do you think the advantages will outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Some findings have revealed that cities around the world are growing large. Could you outline the possible causes and predict consequences? 78
- Some people believe that eventually all jobs will be done by artificial intelligent robots. What is your opinion? 78
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, still, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47586206897 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99528166411 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648275862069 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.9964665522 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.363636364 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234581145952 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735125778232 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751278147068 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142770669938 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080562284488 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.