It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car, a television and a fridge. Do advantage of this development for society outweigh the advantage?
Nowadays, everybody wants to have some electronic equipment like television, fridge and car for transportation. I think that wanting these types of equipment and vehicle can bring more problems for society, in the long run, compared to any advantages it might bring.
Admittedly, there are some basic benefits of having this equipment and vehicle. Among them, the first is that it can make life easy. Refrigerators are widely used to store the food, moreover, it also prevents the food to get spoiled. Similarly, the car has also become part of life as it is comfortable, convenient and most importantly time-saving. In fact, in some areas, the car has become a status symbol because of which people like to have it. Another reason is that this equipment can be used as a source of knowledge as well as for entertainment purpose. Today, there are a plethora of entertainment channels and programmes that one can watch on television, from which a person can broaden their horizons and additionally, add some entertainment in their monotonous life.
Nevertheless, despite the advantage above, I believe that it can make an adverse effect on the environment in the long run. First is that car emits dangerous gases like carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide. Refrigerators are not lagging in spoiling the mother earth because it emits the chloroform carbons which damages the ozone layer around the earth resulting in the rice of temperature. According to a recent survey which indicates that 30% of all pollutants that released to the environment are chlorofluorocarbons and carbon monoxide only. Furthermore, there is a direct impact too on humans that these equipment do, like health problems and wasting time on using it. Last but not the least, the equipment is now too expensive so that it impacts on the budgets of the households.
In recapitulation, everybody wanted to have these equipments and vehicles but I believe that it is a negative development for specifically in long run.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-31 | meet1999 | 56 | view |
| 2020-12-30 | patel_paras7777@yahoo.com | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-30 | patel_paras7777@yahoo.com | 73 | view |
- People have long imagined that possibility that life exists on other planets Do you believe that there is life in the inverse outside of earth What would be the implication of proving that alien exist 73
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how the cement is used to produce concrete for building purpose 78
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 61
- An increasing number of people are now using dating websites to meet their second halves Do you think this tendency help people or does more harm than good 73
- The pie chart below shows the percentage of industry sector s contribution to the economy of India and Turkey in 2000 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 596, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this equipment' or 'these equipments'?
Suggestion: this equipment; these equipments
...e is a direct impact too on humans that these equipment do, like health problems and wasting ti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 688, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this equipment' or 'these equipments'?
Suggestion: this equipment; these equipments
... time on using it. Last, not the least, these equipment are now too expensive so that it impact...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, similarly, so, well, as for, i think, in fact, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01812688822 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96189630943 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525679758308 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1619767317 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.8125 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191971579654 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607804503582 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619436224492 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137159896197 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744101511224 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.