It was predicted that people living in the twenty-first century would have more free time than ever before because of improvements in technology. To what extent has this prediction come true.
There was the forecast that the 21st century technology developments would allow citizens to have got more leisure time. This essay might reveal some practices becoming right and several cases being wrong when comparing to the anticipation of this theme.
On the one hand, there are diverse advantages being generated because of the 21st century technology explosion. First of all, the appearance of Artificial Intteligence permits officers to facilitate in working and to accomplish tasks with the shortest time. The Chat GPT developing by Open AI is a typical circumstance. Being familiar with the Chat GPT will encourage official staffs to complete an assessment with numerous and complicated data within several minutes unless it consumes some weeks without AI helps. Additionally, artificial intelligence robots and household devices helps residents to enjoy the lives because of significant supports of technology. For example, washing machines or cleaning robots allow residents being high-tech to spend less time on housework and have more free time to experience new things.
On the other hand, the above - mentioned developments could trigger many disadvantageous effects. The internet addiction is increasingly popular among the children. They are too young to discriminate benefits and dangers of the internet. Thus, the young consume their time on surfing the toxic violent websites, simultaneously they over-immerse negatively themselves in visual worlds. As an unwanted consequence, children addicting internet have few free time for outdoor activities. Moreover, AI tools allows themselves to generate new generation AIs which are cutting edge functions and independent thoughts without the attendance of human beings. It should lead to that the rights making crucial decisions could belongs to algorithms. So, there is less engineer who understands underground complicated algorithms. One day in the future, human beings will be ruled by AI algorithms if AI developments are out of control strictly. This is the most vital disadvantage being bring about by the drawbacks of technology revolutions.
In conclusion, although having more free time in the 21st technology generation is not deniable, unexpected consequences of advance technologic revolutions are inevitable.
- The pie charts show the results of a survey conducted by a university on the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 67
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists and not local people Why is the case What can be done to attract local people 84
- Many students find it harder to study when they are at university or college than when they were at school Why is this What can be done to solve the problem 84
- This image displays the process of pineapple production 67
- It was predicted that people living in the twenty first century would have more free time than ever before because of improvements in technology To what extent has this prediction come true 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: THREE_NN[1]
Message: You used three nouns after one another, and this might decrease readability. You might consider rewording the sentence.
...ges being generated because of the 21st century technology explosion. First of all, the appearance of Artifi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 716, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires base form of the verb: 'belong'.
Suggestion: belong
...e rights making crucial decisions could belongs to algorithms. So, there is less engine...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1958.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75882352941 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10684125264 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629411764706 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.024704027 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.052631579 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8947368421 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73684210526 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173601113207 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501874975233 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639608894734 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13076870508 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052147595829 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.83 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.