Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Due to the difference in several perspectives, several people now support the idea that knowledge accomplished from former times do not have any advantageous impacts on our modern society. From my perspective, I found no justification to agree with this unreasonable statement since there is a variety of valuable lesson that can be learned from the past
In the first place, citizens living in the present can have colossal benefits from past mistakes. There seems to be no shadow of a doubt that by analysing and interpreting our antiquity, modern people can complete themselves through our ancestors' experience, thereby, avoiding reiterating the same blunders anew. To be specific, one could straightforwardly recognize the severe impacts of wars on the global scale once they have been outbroken by observing the mortality rates as well as figure for the widespread destruction on historical documentaries or journals. Therefore, nowadays, every national leader are equipped with in-depth historical knowledge, especially in decision-making and problem-solving abilities, with the aim of becoming a more well-rounded governor when compared to their precursors.
Additionally, history is the foundation of further discoveries and invention. It does not seem unreasonable to suggest that information enriched and passed down through various generations is the culprit of our civilization. Consequently, since the life expectancy of one particular individual is insufficient, numerous miraculous advance in science cannot be attained without the concerted and continuous efforts by several brilliant scientists in an extended period of time. By way of illustration, the international network, which is one of the most influent inventions of humans, is one of several appliances of the fundamental mathematical formulas established in ancient times.
In conclusion, the past can provide our society with a great deal of valuable knowledge since we can learn a lot from our ancestors' mistakes. Furthermore, history can be the foundation for further invention achieved by the concerted effort of people in various different era
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-27 | Nanddy | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-19 | Sayansh Garg | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-13 | Kubraguran | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-12 | ATUL SAI DONAKANTI | 71 | view |
| 2021-03-19 | elisabetta_fedele | 84 | view |
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen Is it positive or negative development 89
- The flow chart illustrates the consequences of deforestation Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 78
- Some people think that the range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor Others think it has an opposite effect Discuss both views and give opinions 78
- There is no future for public transport, because travelling by car is so much more convenient.Write your composition. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 462, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ral brilliant scientists in an extended period of time. By way of illustration, the internatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72641509434 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38589302657 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61320754717 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.2441427552 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.545454545 106.682146367 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9090909091 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109314573889 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373383002411 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480014675117 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0735531969158 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509850911637 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.0946893788 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.55 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.