Living In A Country Where You Have To Speak A Foreign Language Can Cause Serious Social And Practical Problems
Migration could be really annoying especially when someone should encounter with new languages. While, speaking with another language could bring several advantages and lead to acquaintance with the second language, it would results in some hurdles which cannot be neglected. I almost agree that the most challenging issue in front of foreigners would be learning second language. The issue will be disclosed in the following paragraphs.
Admittedly, each country has its own language and almost all locals prefer to speak based on their desire which would be their maternal language. As a result of their eagerness to speak with their own language, it would be unavoidable for migrants to learn the local language. It could benefit them for several reasons. Firstly, they can make communicate easily and speak up their needs. The second noteworthy issue is that they could manage better their pitfalls when faced with new problem. For example, if they accused for robbery or something like that, the defense of themselves would be more straightforward.
Conversely, if migrants insist on speaking with their own language and do not show any perseverance to learn their destination`s language, it could cause vigorous difficulties. For example, when you are buying it is likely to be cheated or at least did not attain any discounts for your shopping. Besides, It would be unimaginable to find a job without well-information about local`s language. Needless to say, in almost all countries, knowing their language is a respect to their culture undoubtedly which would be cherished more by locals.
As arguments outlined above, learning language of destination is a vital for migrants or those who wish to be able communicate as well as possible with locals. Speaking with the local language will ease your social correlations and mitigate your pitfalls which encounter in a foreign country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-20 | milad_salehi2002 | 73 | view |
| 2020-03-12 | B1_Ai_N | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | saied hussein | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Living In A Country Where You Have To Speak A Foreign Language Can Cause Serious Social And Practical Problems 73
- The table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and year after It was refurbished The charts showed a result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 78
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
...ance with the second language, it would results in some hurdles which cannot be neglect...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 365, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to second'
Suggestion: to second
...n front of foreigners would be learning second language. The issue will be disclosed i...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, conversely, first, firstly, if, really, second, so, well, while, at least, for example, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33222591362 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97155976508 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544850498339 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.306289255 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.3125 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8125 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117461025711 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431051933533 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420617174615 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0814692007261 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025404915177 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.