Maintaining public libraries is a waste of time since digital technology is now replacing their function. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
As society develops, digital technology has been developed significantly and which threatens the existence of public libraries. While I understand that the digital technology can contain massive information and it is more efficient for the storages of books, public libraries can be useful for stored of old documentations and it is especially useful for elders.
Digital technology has developed and people are heavily relied on seeking the information from the digital technology. Since the digital technology contains massive amount of information which any libraries cannot hold, the existence of public libraries becomes a wasteful. As a result of this, the more people are reading a book from the digital technology for its convenient reasons. Mostly books are heavy to hold and inconvenient to carry around whereas technology is hardly weighting and it is easily storable so the popularity of reading through digital technology is growing massively. Therefore, the existence and maintenance of public libraries become useless.
However, the public libraries have massive information that is old that may not be able to obtain anywhere else and it is already valuable to see those old documentation in person. For example, the national public libraries of Korea hold historical documentation such as the newspapers from 1930s or 1950s and those can be useful for researchers or students to study. From this example, we can conclude that by observing of old historical papers can be valuable. Also the public libraries have other functions than just stored of information. In particular, seniors have a difficulty to adapt those modern devices and they cannot search for information by use of those technologies. Thus, the maintenance of public libraries is somehow required for specific reasons.
In conclusion, it is true that the development of technology has threatened the existence of public libraries as most of information can be found through the modern devices. However, the reason for the existence of public libraries are not only stored of information but it provides the convenient for seniors whom have difficulty to adapt of modern technologies as well as inheritance documentation is worth saving.
- The chart below shows the percentage of children aged 0 to 5 and adults aged 60 and over, selected Census years. 78
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of time since digital technology is now replacing their function. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The table below shows the results of a survey on workplace complaints in Germany in 2001. 67
- Motorways help people travel quickly and cover long distances but they also cause problemsWhat are the problems of motorways and what solutions are there? 73
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 263, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...e existence of public libraries becomes a wasteful. As a result of this, the more people a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'those cans'?
Suggestion: this can; those cans
... the newspapers from 1930s or 1950s and those can be useful for researchers or students t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 463, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... old historical papers can be valuable. Also the public libraries have other functio...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'whereas', 'while', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'in particular', 'such as', 'as a result', 'as well as', 'it is true']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.208556149733 0.247107183377 84% => OK
Verbs: 0.163101604278 0.155533422707 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.133689839572 0.0946595960268 141% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0668449197861 0.0501214627716 133% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0267379679144 0.0437548338989 61% => OK
Prepositions: 0.141711229947 0.122226691241 116% => OK
Participles: 0.0427807486631 0.0403226058552 106% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.06753227421 2.80594681477 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0187165775401 0.0326793684256 57% => OK
Particles: 0.00267379679144 0.00163938923432 163% => OK
Determiners: 0.0882352941176 0.0861772015684 102% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.024064171123 0.021408717616 112% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0133689839572 0.011925033212 112% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2222.0 1933.35771543 115% => OK
No of words: 345.0 316.048096192 109% => OK
Chars per words: 6.44057971014 6.12580529183 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20517956788 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.452173913043 0.374742101984 121% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.344927536232 0.28420135186 121% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.260869565217 0.203846283523 128% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.205797101449 0.137316102897 150% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06753227421 2.80594681477 109% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.037074148 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455072463768 0.56093040696 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 46.2326152366 60.7387585426 76% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0891783567 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.7743622355 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3989596237 49.517814964 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.133333333 127.492653851 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7743622355 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.2 0.814263465372 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.99599198397 75% => OK
Readability: 57.4927536232 49.1944974215 117% => OK
Elegance: 1.53125 1.69124875643 91% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241457208243 0.332605444948 73% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.13316953987 0.102741220458 130% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0690949600313 0.0668466124924 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.589595977949 0.534860350844 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.155237767223 0.148594505496 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124263446182 0.134430193775 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518483359859 0.0742795772207 70% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.460689022052 0.324371583561 142% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0842303139459 0.0638462369009 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190490363299 0.228012699653 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272187446756 0.058150111329 47% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.68436873747 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.41683366733 146% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 5.90881763527 85% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.5751503006 155% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 1.9629258517 255% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.4468937876 134% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.