As major cities in the world are growing today, so do their problems.
What are problems for young people who are living in the cities as the result of continued growth? What are solutions for these problems?
It is true that big cities across the world have increasingly grown in recent years, leading to the increase in its concerns. Due to this phenomenon, younger generation living in these cities faces several disadvantages; however, particular options can be taken to address these problems.
On the one hand, the growth of major towns has harmful effects on young people. Initially, the growth in number of people in cities can lead to competitive job market. In fact, many research studies have shown that the unemployment rate of younger generation, especially in big cities, is much more higher compared to others. The number of jobs may not accomodate the huge number of people living in cities, and businesses tend to employ experient candidates rather than who are fresh out of college. This can make young job seekers hard to find a job, causing the frustration among them or self-doubt in long term. Moreover, younger people can also suffer from the limited educational opportunities duo to the growth in cities. These cities may struggle to provide adequate educational facilities and resources, causing overcrowded classrooms as well as decrease in access to quality education.
However, such problems can be adressed with effective sollutions. Firstly, younger generation should attend several vocational trainings or practical programs to gain hand-on experiences. This may enhance their curriculum vitae as well as their chances to pursue their careers. Furthermore, government should invest in educational facilities, constructing more schools that can provide enough schooling capacity for children, for example. This can make children receive better care by teachers, improving their access to quality education.
In conclusion, while the growth in major towns causes the increase in problems youngsters have to face, particularly competivive job market and limited educational opportunities, these concerns can be tackled with the suitable solutions from government.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-08 | hinhin411 | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | Phuong1810 | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-14 | hi.nguyn91 | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-28 | vanhhoang | 56 | view |
| 2022-09-23 | mary.ssherr | 73 | view |
- Some people think that children should aim to do their best at whatever they are doing Others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- The diagrams illustrate the process of building an igloo 56
- The diagram shows the life cycle of a salmon 61
- Nowadays people depend on technology for leisure activities Is this a positive or negative development 78
- Many women are choosing to have children later in life Why is this Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...tion, especially in big cities, is much more higher compared to others. The number of jobs ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 687, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'opportunities'' or 'opportunity's'?
Suggestion: opportunities'; opportunity's
...lso suffer from the limited educational opportunities duo to the growth in cities. These citi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 847, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urces, causing overcrowded classrooms as well as decrease in access to quality ed...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, may, moreover, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62126245847 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93991214319 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604651162791 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.91410591 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.8 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206115244796 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635670114732 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383589349553 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119268466012 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00541830539004 0.056905535591 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.