The manufacturing and use of cars damages the environment but their popularity is increasing? Why is this? How could this be controlled?
Since industrial revolution was occurred, machines have improved to become one of the main vehicles for human’s transportation. During these years, because cars have been spreading much amount of fossil-fuel power to the air, lots of damages have happened to the earth’s atmosphere. Although many individuals have been aware of the adverse effects of their vehicles, they have still used them. This essay is going to talk about the reasons of this issue as well as the solutions.
To commence with, there have been several causes which has propelled the demand for usage of cars to be heightening. But one of the main ones that should not be overlooked, is the vehicles’ low prices. In fact, beneficial cars for the environment, which have been produced, have been more expensive than regular ones. For example, the first hybrid car, which has produced in 1990 in the United States, has been extremely luxurious that most of the people could not afford to buy. Moreover, another factor is the comfort of using the regular vehicles for individuals. Actually, people have chosen cars to be their major vehicles because they have been absolutely convenience and easy to use. On the other hand, hybrid cars have had more difficulties such as spending much amount of time to charge them with power. As a result, human’s tendency to select the easiest way for their issues has encouraged them not to buy hybrid ones.
Even though it has been absolutely difficult to stimulate human-beings to increase their demand for beneficial vehicles for the earth, there have been several solutions which could be taken in order to decline their damages. Based on the following reasons, these solutions could be to not only make hybrid vehicles’ current expenses to be lower, but also produce them in a way which could be easier to be used. For instance, generating these cars’ options not to be so complex in order to be comfort to follow by both young and old people. Consequently, by applying these solutions, the demand for those kinds of vehicles may be enlarged.
In conclusion, educating people to be aware of global warming and other horrible effects on the environment could not be enough to solve this difficulty. By identifying the causes such as expensive costs of beneficial vehicles for environment, individuals have been more accurate to reduce the consequences of human’s activities and devices in their surroundings.
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Topic As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work job satisfaction is an important element of individual well being What factors contribute to job satisfaction How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers 73
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Nowadays there have been a discussion about people s weight and their physical condition Although walking has been one of the practical way for staying in shape In these days many people haven t gone walking for many diverse reasons which will be mentione 56
- With the increased use of computers education is being delivered online without teachers It is likely that there would be no role of teachers in providing education in the future Do you agree with this view 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, first, if, look, may, moreover, so, still, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 13.1623246493 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2041.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 400.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1025 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75552966778 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 637.2 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.836122636 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.388888889 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212669736183 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757596027162 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558059560259 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144119797351 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246795793373 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.