The manufacturing and use of cars damages the environment but their popularity is increasing. Why is this? How could this be controlled?
It is true that cars are one of the greatest causes of environmental degradation, yet the demand for car use is ascending. Several reasons can be attributed to this trend, and there are solutions that the government can adopt to tackle this issue.
Financial statements and the change in demand of people nowadays greatly contribute to the rise in car use. In terms of economic situation, cars have become more affordable that almost every household could own one. Take the USA into consideration, the average salary of American people is around $95000 per year, while car prices are generally do not exceed $35000. That means they need only 5 to 6 months of working to purchase a car. Regarding the change in demand, under the migration waves, the number or employees choosing a workplace in another city has been growing, resulting in dependence on cars to commute. Travelling by cars is by far convenient, especially when there are bulky luggage or fresh food to deliver when visiting their hometown.
However, measures can be taken to mitigate the use of car as well as their negative impact on the environment by the government. Firstly, tariffs on fuel and cars should be raised. Charging cars upon entering city centres, like the congestion charge in London or even imposing an official ban on cars entering the city on specified days of the week as Athens does is also a potential consideration. Secondly, resources should be allocated to upgrade and expand public transport provision. In order to encourage the use of public transports, they must be made comfortable and accessible for residents. Finally, in order to cut down on emissions and to reduce our carbon footprint, the production of electric cars must be encouraged, and corporations like Volkswagen, Tesla are already leading the way in this field.
In conclusion, reasons for an increase in car use is obvious to identify, however, several steps can be taken by the government to alleviate this problem and protect the Earth.
- The internet means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In many counties more and more women have full time jobs as men There is a logic that they should share the housework equally with men To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Housing areas with taller buildings or building houses on a wider area of land What solution is better 89
- Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together Discuss both views and state your own opinion 61
- Some companies sponsor sport and sports stars as a way to advertise themselves Some people think it is good while others think there are disadvantages Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
...e are solutions that the government can adopt to tackle this issue. Financial statement...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 343, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
...er year, while car prices are generally do not exceed 5000. That means they need o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.996996997 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8373595415 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6025273516 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.933333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286560374239 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904816465923 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547815208075 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18069120783 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03861037833 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.