In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing.
Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?f
In many regions all around the world, the countryside population is dwindling due to people moving to the cities. This is because rural people seek conveniences available in the towns. In my opinion, the development is negative as it could bring about many problems.
Firstly, more rural people living in the cities increases the use of vehicles, which could emit more exhaust fumes to the environment. As people assemble in the cities, the number of personal vehicles such as cars or motorbikes would increase, and the exhaust fumes from these means of transportation could deteriorate the quality of the environment. According to Vnexpress, the air quality in Hanoi is worsening every day mainly because of emissions from transport, which could affect Hanoians' immune systems and health.
Moreover, the increasing number of rural people moving to metropolitan areas precipitates overpopulation. Thus, green space is transformed into housing areas to fulfil the housing need of people, leading to cities without nature and fresh air. The increasing population in the cities means fewer free spaces for parks and trees and severe housing density, resulting in people feeling stifled by the cities' environment. Hanoi's citizens, for example, always complain about the city's lack of parks since many green areas in Hanoi are converted into tall buildings and houses.
In conclusion, the decreasing rural population due to people moving to the towns could worsen the environmental quality and steal green spaces for trees or parks in metropolitan areas. Thus, I believe this development contributes badly to people's life.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-08-15 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that certain old buildings should be preserved more than others What types of old buildings should be preserved Do you think the advantages of preserving old buildings outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people think that good health is a basic human need so medical services should not be run by profit making companies Do the advantages of private health care outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Parents are putting a lot of pressure on their children to succeed Is it a positive or negative development 61
- Some people say the fashion industry has a bad effect on people s lives Do you agree 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 271, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this means' or 'these means'?
Suggestion: this means; these means
...ld increase, and the exhaust fumes from these means of transportation could deteriorate the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cities'' or 'city's'?
Suggestion: cities'; city's
...h air. The increasing population in the cities means fewer free spaces for parks and t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cities'' or 'city's'?
Suggestion: cities'; city's
...ulting in people feeling stifled by the cities environment. Hanois citizens, for examp...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, thus, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41501976285 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83945262545 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541501976285 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6443832494 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.166666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270750432855 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108804888457 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780213786806 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187603610591 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112939615799 0.056905535591 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 271, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this means' or 'these means'?
Suggestion: this means; these means
...ld increase, and the exhaust fumes from these means of transportation could deteriorate the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cities'' or 'city's'?
Suggestion: cities'; city's
...h air. The increasing population in the cities means fewer free spaces for parks and t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cities'' or 'city's'?
Suggestion: cities'; city's
...ulting in people feeling stifled by the cities environment. Hanois citizens, for examp...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, thus, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41501976285 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83945262545 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541501976285 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6443832494 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.166666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270750432855 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108804888457 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780213786806 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187603610591 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112939615799 0.056905535591 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.