In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. SOme people think new teachers and doctors should work in rural areas for a few years. But other people think everyone should have the freedom to choose where they work.

Due to wide gap between rural and urban tracts of a nation, many people are of the opinion that new teachers and doctors should provide their services to the rural areas. However, there are some people who argue that it is the teachers or doctors wish to decide where to work. I will further discuss both sides of the argument.

There are many advantages to the fresh teachers and doctors by working in rural areas. Firstly, the people in the rural areas can have access to medical facilities and education. Secondly, the teachers and doctors who are fresh from universities and with sound knowledge can translate their theoretical knowledge into practical knowledge. Thirdly, there are many doctors and teachers in urban areas. So, no institution would opt for fresh candidates. Therefore, these candidates can gain lots of experience in their early years of career and some teachers and doctors can even stay in the rural area to serve the people in that locality.

However, there are some people who argue that in a democratic country like India, people have their right to choose where to work. It is often true that if people are sent to rural areas without their will, they may work passively and the villagers do not get any benefit from their services. Secondly, there will be fewer and fewer students who would choose such type of jobs and in the long run, there would be shortage of jobs.

I believe that government should send the fresh doctors and teachers to rural areas for work and provide them with some incentives and high salaries which would further help to bridge the gap between rural and urban areas.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...argue that it is the teachers or doctors wish to decide where to work. I will fur...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, as for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82857142857 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30925378883 2.80592935109 82% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478571428571 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8180980279 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343342085871 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135541869888 0.084324248473 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861342804345 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221797662781 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357698744444 0.056905535591 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.