In many countries household waste eg. Food packing is increasing day by day. What are the reasons? How can this problem be solved?
There are concerns about the remarkable growth of domestic waste in many parts of the world. I find that the awareness and impact of the media can be some of the main reasons leading to humongous wastage, and the community can take some measures to address these issues.
There is no doubt about thousands of reasons contributing to the huge quantity of household rubbish. One of them is the poor awareness of citizens ignoring environmental issues. For example, those people tend to use plastic bags instead of canvas when shopping. They find those kinds more convenient than the traditional ones, regardless of their negative effects on the ecosystem. Furthermore, advertisements associated with modern lifestyles on media platforms result in a sharp increase in domestic trash. Residents are likely to purchase more household items than they need, such as trendy clothes or electric appliances. As a result, that stuff might quickly become garbage when it is no longer fashionable and eye-catching enough.
However, there are some methods that could help tackle these problems. First, raising awareness about environmentalism through campaigns and lessons by local authorities can play a critical role. Residents are willing to minimize their home garbage when they understand the importance of environmental protection. Second, media companies should create content or innovation for both friendly environmental items and simple lifestyles rather than those related to consumerism. When it comes to trendiness, each person will actively reuse, reduce, and recycle their domestic waste.
In conclusion, people are responsible for significantly large household waste because their awareness and lifestyles depend on the tendency of advertising. Those numbers of domestic waste will increase unless people attempt to restrict their waste, such as taking 3-R methods and caring about global problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-15 | Lunar Tran | 67 | view |
| 2022-05-15 | Lunar Tran | 84 | view |
- Plastic bags plastic bottles and plastic packaging are bad for the environment What damage does plastic do to the environment What can be done by governments and individuals to solve this problem 89
- Art is considered an important part of a society as well as an expression of its culture Do you think it is important for children to be taught art Do you think children should be encouraged to focus on art rather than other subjects 89
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research Discu 78
- The world s natural resources are consumed at an ever increased rate What are the dangers of this situation What should we do 61
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...wareness and impact of the media can be some of the main reasons leading to humongous wasta...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 580, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...educe, and recycle their domestic waste. In conclusion, people are responsible fo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74647887324 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03219516168 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616197183099 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1163638482 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.571428571 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0951822772697 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0324704579254 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341474873231 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0681762507822 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445923217068 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.