In many countries, old or traditional languages are dying out or being forgotten especially by younger people. Is this an acceptable development which occurs inevitably, or is it something which we should try to prevent?
It is quite common for new generation to forget about the traditional language of the nation. The issue is not entirely straightforward, and arguments can also be made against the idea. In this essay, debate will be discussed and given a concluding view.
On the one hand, it might be said that young people see no point in sticking to traditional languages. This may range from including limited usage of language in daily life, secondary medium of communication and less career opportunities. For instance, job prospects available in the market for our native language are vey less. Furthermore, in any business meeting the primary medium of communication is English.
On the other hand, those who support the traditional languages cite many benefits it can bring to a youth. Firstly, The government should take some necessary action steps and announce to use the native language as the primary medium of communication in school be it public or private. This would help to restore the importance of old language at School Level. Secondly, Parents should teach children about the culture and values of traditional language. Finally, Student's examination paper should always be drafted and prepared in native language only despite of whatever the subject is. For instance, as per a recent study by IMF about 50% of young people have shown their interest in the traditional language while with other major subjects.
To conclude, it appears that aim of these traditional languages is to restore old language back in the lives of young people who have already forgotten it. A longer term and more thoughtful program is surely needed.
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?Gi 73
- Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas. 89
- You recently applied for 2 separate jobs. Both have chosen to hire you, but you must write a letter to 1 of them explaining why you are unable to take the position. Include in your letter:· An apology· An explanation of your situation 89
- You recently noticed a local restaurant that was offering a part-time job.Write a letter to the restaurant's manager. In your letter,. explain that you would like to apply for the job. give some details of any relevant experience that you have. specify th 56
- A family member is coming to stay with you. He/she will be arriving by train in the morning, but you won’t be home until the evening.Write a letter to your relative. In your letter:explain arrangements you have made for them to have keys and get into t 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... career opportunities. For instance, job prospects available in the market for ou...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15355805243 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82992943555 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602996254682 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0267868336 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7333333333 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181977316504 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587095864949 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335535783665 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107621964107 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341374863479 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.