In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society?
What is your opinion on that?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Experts throughout the developing and developed world have debated whether ageing population is the beneficial or detrimental effect to our society. Alongside the arguments from both sides, the latest sociological discoveries have casted light on the ensuing implication in accordance with the intensified burden on economy and additional senior workforce in neighbourhood. This essay will discuss both views by using the examples from the Hong Kong University.
To begin with, the hindrance of societal development is intuitively perceived as a downside of the increasing proportion of older people. The central reason behind this is twofold, firstly business sectors need to rise the budget for paying pension. Secondly, the government spending on social welfare is likely to surge. In fact, recent empirical research from the Hong Kong University established that the construction of facilities designated to the elderly has accounted for a significant proportion of the overall expenses in past decades. Moreover, even if some seniors originating from affluent families seldom employ the related public service, the use of medication and treatment is deemed more time-consuming comparing to their junior counterparts. Therefore, it is conclusively clear that the ageing population, to a considerable extent, impede the growth of a nation.
Although there is a case for straining the public resources, the impact of ageing population cannot be overstated, in particular the extra workforce that are affordable in neighbourhood. This is largely because the medical advancement ensure the retirees possessing an energetic vitality, which in turn pave the way for them to participate in social work. For instance, according to an extensive study from the Hong Kong University, the utilisation of child-care service offered by the elderly has been witnessed a growth over the last decade. Admittedly, nurture might be better handled by parents; however, without the preparation of family dinner by these skilled elderly, the prolonged working hours is likely to weaken the family bonding. Seen in this light, the employment of a senior home assistant increase the likeliness of harmonised family even if both parents need to work.
In conclusion, there is ample evidence suggesting that the ageing population constitutes a positive driver underpinning the busy society at a cost of financial burden facing by the governments worldwide. It is predicted that tax will be increased to balance the spending in the foreseeable future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-06 | wardiati | 56 | view |
| 2018-08-29 | RockyGagKy | 89 | view |
| 2018-07-17 | RockyGagKy | 89 | view |
- Some people think that companies and private individuals should pay to clean up the pollution that they produce, not the government. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The table shows the worldwide market share of mobile phone manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006. 78
- Many teachers assign homework to students every day. Do you think that daily homework is necessary for students?Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 89
- Some people claim that there are more disadvantages of the car than its advantages. Do you agree or disagree? Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of having a car. 89
- The presence of technology in the classroom has become more and more apparent and offers students tremendous resources with which to supplement their education. Given time, technology will completely replace the traditional teacher in the classroom.Do you 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2154.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.609375 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10395255833 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609375 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 689.4 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8657280208 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.625 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111733629377 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0326979657519 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0238653443719 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636731236704 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249659335152 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.91 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 78.4519038076 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.