Nowadays, increasing amount of old people is one of the most prominent challenges in lots of countries in all over the world. This phenomenon is obvious especially in modern countries and there are some debates among experts about advantages and disadvantages of that in these countries.
Some social expert believe that in this competitive and complicated situation of world, developed countries need young people to distribute their economical and industrial purposes. Because of the lack of young employees, these countries force to accept younger people from foreign countries as worker or expert. The last published reports in Canada illustrated that amount of immigrants have been increased more than 30% during the recent decade in this country. Some immigration protesters believe that because of cultural and social effects of immigrants, this issue can be perilous for host countries. Recent years, governments in lots of developed countries have encourage their inhabitants to reproduction by increasing facilities for parents and new generation babies.
In the other hand, some other experts think that devise a population control plan in most countries is unavoidable and increasing amount of old people is a logical result of this policy. They emphasize that in this tendency governments can allocate more facilities and privileges to younger people to improve their lifestyle. Additionally, most of these experts are agree with immigration policies in their countries. They believe that accepting immigrants from other countries causes to developing global attitude in economy.
In conclusion, statistics show that most countries are reluctant to increase their population. Hence, by pursuing this pattern, amount of old people will be additive. I believe that to increase productivity and efficiency in jobs and distribution continuous improvements on future, governments should predict some increasing population programs. I think reproduction and create new generation make societies happier undoubtedly.
- The tradition that famliy gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts on families and societies? 61
- the maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 78
- Scientist have been warning for many years that in order to protect the environment people should use less energy.However,most people do not change that ways of thing .what is causing the behaviour?how can people be encourged to change. 73
- Meadowside village and Fonton development over three periods (1962, 1985 and the present) 73
- Some believe that people should not continue to work once they reach the age of retirement. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your experience 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 244, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'accepting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: accepting
... young employees, these countries force to accept younger people from foreign countries a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 668, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'encouraged'.
Suggestion: encouraged
...nts in lots of developed countries have encourage their inhabitants to reproduction by in...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...Additionally, most of these experts are agree with immigration policies in their coun...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 527, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... developing global attitude in economy. In conclusion, statistics show that most...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78260869565 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04765783063 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531772575251 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5306568363 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.266666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236515658068 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849972915712 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511748235754 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154514934491 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382966782922 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.