In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Few people paid enormous sums of money in many nations. Some people believe that the more high salaries workers could have, the more benefits the countries may have. In contrast, others think that governments should restrict incomes to a certain level. In this essay, both views will be discussed and elaborate on my opinion.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why some individuals support the difference in salaries of employees. First of all, highly educated people had invested too much time in acquiring knowledge and education will always ask for higher pay, such as scientists, engineers, and medical experts.
For example, a leader in a technology project needs not only savvy programming skills but also excellent project management skills to maneuver his team to the final impeccable product. Therefore, they should be paid higher than those who only focus on the smaller scope of work. Besides, a lucrative income is compensation due to their effort and long working hours. Secondly, societies would be more prosperous if one person could earn more since there would be a significant rise in the amount of taxes paid by people with higher salaries. Consequently, citizens' quality of life would increase dramatically, especially in health and education.
On the other hand, it is argued by many that the increasing income gap should be restricted, and the authorities should have a system to keep control of the salaries. Furthermore, those individuals believe it is unfair that some workers earn exorbitant wages, while others could not cover their daily needs. Another reason I would consider is, in certain countries, the discrimination of sex, nationality, and skin color via the sums of money they earn may underline social equality, which eventually ruins the civilized worlds we have striving to foster for decades. For instance, people in developing countries have to travel to other regions to find a job so they would be employed even with a low income. Meanwhile, citizens would not find opportunities to be employed. As a result, this could increase the gap between privileged and non-privileged people.
In conclusion, although a majority of people believe that policymakers should impose restrictions on the income gap between employees, In my opinion, I would argue that people should earn their money based on their competence and merit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-08 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-16 | BoyClazz | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-16 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-20 | lucynton | 84 | view |
| 2022-03-21 | quynh123445 | 84 | view |
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and 73
- In many countries a small number of people earn extremely high salaries Some people believe that this is good for the country but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level Discuss both these views and give your own opin 84
- In many countries a small number of people earn extremely high salaries Some people believe that this is good for the country but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level Discuss both these views and give your own opin 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 7.85571142285 267% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2001.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 381.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25196850394 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82951806087 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574803149606 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.283139096 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.166666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5555555556 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254994444588 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750842677486 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624717689004 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155575889786 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106794207551 0.056905535591 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.