In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Awarding huge remuneration to little proportion of people is assumed well for nation. Partially, I consent to the same perspective for reasonable points, which I will elaborate in the forthcoming paragraph.
One the one side, those who oppose to this highlight that the growing number of crime rate committed by lower-middle class is aroused by millionaires flaunting their wealth, thus the unsafe situation is occurring in one particular area, especially known for tourist attraction. This happens to Kim Kardashian, American socialite, who was robbed in Paris with a loss of $10million (jewellery) after posting in her Instagram. In addition, extremely salaries create social gap between the rich and the poor. It can be seen that there has been different service, almost in all aspects. In the health realm, wealthy people receive VIP access and other health insurance.
On the one side, those who propose rich society endowing a nation opine that the presence of affluent people will increase economic growth by paying taxes from their amenities so as to eventually achieve prosperity. Cited by UK Government, the parliament enacts revenue taxes of 45% per year up to £150,000. Furthermore, the personages frequently donate their wealth and support those in need. This charity will reduce poverty by covering many aspects (education, health, and research development). According to Los Angeles Times, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation donates approximately US$5 millions in 2022, and ameliorate global issue since 2000.
Overall, it seems to me that awarding extreme salaries to some people are worth implementing because of the positive impacts which will be able to enhance economic development and support those in need to procure better quality of lives. This is as long as society remains in a balance social status.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-08 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-16 | BoyClazz | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-16 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-20 | lucynton | 84 | view |
| 2022-03-21 | quynh123445 | 84 | view |
- In recent years some countries have experienced very rapid economic development This has resulted in higher standards of living in urban areas but not in the countryside What problems could this cause How could these problems be reduced 78
- Some people think that children should begin their formal education at a very early age Others think they should begin after 7 years of age Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Providing financial aid to the poor can increase poverty To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Most countries want to improve standard of living through economic development however others think social value is lost as a result Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some young people like to copy the behaviour and clothes of famous people today Why might this be the case What problems can it cause 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 637, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m, wealthy people receive VIP access and other health insurance. On the one si...
^^
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...th by paying taxes from their amenities so as to eventually achieve prosperity. Cited by...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'aspects'' or 'aspect's'?
Suggestion: aspects'; aspect's
...ty will reduce poverty by covering many aspects education, health, and research develop...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, thus, well, as to, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37282229965 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82343553042 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679442508711 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.1454025192 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.142857143 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64285714286 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135740022073 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040569045697 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034840775549 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0806260800877 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240339128793 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.