In many countries, there is not enough recycling for waste materials (e.g. paper, can, glass). What are the reasons of this situation? What can be done to encourage recycling?
There is a tendency that recycling waste materials has been paid little attention in many countries. This essay will examine the underlying reasons for this problem and propose some plausible solutions.
The inadequate advanced machinery and inappropriate classification of domestic waste are the plausible factors restraining recycling processes. First and foremost, numerous households across the globe are more inclined to discard a mix of plastic bags and leftovers into the same bin without having an appropriate classification method, making it challenging for recycling since plastic and glass containers cannot be recycled with bacteria stemming from decaying vegetables and fruits. Additionally, financial hardships facing many underdeveloped countries have restricted their access to technological advancements for waste recycling. For example, in some parts of India, people are struggling with plastic waste due to the shortage of advanced machines for recycling, leaving them surrounded by trash.
Despite the problems mentioned above, there are practical solutions to address the issue. Firstly, governments can provide residents with guidelines on the classification of domestic waste before disposal. These guidelines can be accompanied by strict penalties for deliberate non-compliance to ensure the effectiveness of such instructions. Furthermore, governments across the globe should offer lower-income nations advanced machines and techniques for waste treatment. This can reduce the burden on those countries and prompt them to focus on recycling for a more sustainable environment.
In conclusion, although the lack of technological advances and inappropriate classification methods can challenge the process of recycling waste materials, there are plausible resolutions to this phenomenon. International aid and practical guidelines can facilitate recycling in many countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-16 | Tuan Harry | 61 | view |
- People are living longer after they retire What are the problems What can be done to solve the problems 95
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the advantages 84
- Research indicates that nowadays some consumers are much less influenced by advertising than in the past What do you think are the reasons for this Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any releva 93
- Some people argue job satisfaction is more important than job security Others believe a permanent job is more important Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.25475285171 5.12529762239 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34089654576 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608365019011 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.442689142 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.538461538 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335210079638 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119544398311 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060677748169 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215198686986 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242283628069 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.97 12.4159519038 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.