In numerous nations, there is a growing trend for individuals to frequently discuss financial matters, such as their earnings or expenditures, in everyday conversation.
What are the reasons behind this phenomenon? Is it advantageous or detrimental?
Raising questions about monthly incomes and other financial issues in daily conversations has become more prevalent in substantial nations across the globe. This essay will examine the underlying reasons behind this phenomenon and elaborate on its detrimental impacts on the human health of young people.
There are several reasons for mentioning the topic of personal incomes and living expenses in daily conversations, one of which can stem from the close relationships among people. Throughout history, as most individuals have undergone financial hardships due to the fatal impacts of prolonged wars and erratic climate changes, they have had an extraordinary willingness to provide others with assistance, including food and clothes, tightening the relationship among individuals. As a result, asking personal questions, such as marital status or financial issues, has emerged as a norm to show wariness and great care towards others. For instance, it is common sense in the Vietnamese culture among people to initiate a conversation, including enquiries about career prospects and salary since they contend that such questions will enhance the relationship towards higher levels.
Despite the merits analyzed above, this trend can exert negative impacts on the human health of younger generations. As younger individuals nowadays are living in a highly competitive world where each individual has to compete fiercely to secure a permanent job with a lucrative income, conservations whose contents are mainly about financial issues and living expenses can put them under great pressure, resulting in consistent depression and other mental health issues. For instance, numerous graduated students residing in major cities in developed countries are struggling to get a job, which, in turn, deepens depression and stress due to the shortage of income. Therefore, questions directed to expenditures and financial potentials can exert some negative impacts on the mental health of young people, posing a risk to more severe consequences.
In conclusion, there are various explanations for the trend of raising financial questions in daily conversations, one of which can be seen through the relationships among people. Despite the advantages of the trend, I argue that this phenomenon can be disadvantageous to the mental health of the young generations who face obstacles in job seeking.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-26 | Tuan Harry | 78 | view |
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 84
- Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
- It is not necessary to travel to other places to learn the culture of other people We can learn just as much from books films and the internet Do you agree or disagree 84
- The research indicates that nowadays some consumers are less influenced by advertising than in the past What are the reasons and is it a positive or negative development 73
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 218, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...e. Despite the advantages of the trend, I argue that this phenomenon can be disad...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, therefore, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2041.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66944444444 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02758791454 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.6105407351 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.083333333 106.682146367 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189357188982 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695806355386 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369154178412 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122909482453 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415510754577 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.3 13.0946893788 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.11 50.2224549098 48% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 11.3001002004 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.2 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.