In many countries today, both men and women need to work full time. Therefore, some people think that men and women should share household tasks equally. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In today’s constantly-changing world, there is a discussion associated with the role of men and women with regard to doing housework. Whether they should share these tasks equally or not still remains a matter of controversy. This essay agrees that the household chores should be shared equally by both genders in order to gain life satisfaction and enhance members’ relationship.
It is irrefutable that allocating housework equally leads to high level of pleasure in various aspects of life. To be particular, effective household-chore accomplishment allows males and females to devote for their occupation and personal interests, which attain happiness in their lives. Moreover, with a rising number of educated and employed women in modern life, provided that there are no longer inequality and prejudice in the family, satisfaction would be assured. For instance, while housework tend to be done by women mostly, yard work, maintenance and repairs are likely to be men responsibility; tasks are done with efficiency and people have more time for their pursuits.
It is undeniable that doing household tasks together is beneficial to the love relationship. In other words, couples can obtain understanding of their partner through the working process, thus conflicts and arguments are prevented. In addition, running errands relieves pressure and depression, becoming one of the contributors to a satisfactory relationship. According to some researches, sharing household responsibilities, which are more observed in young couples, improves well-being of the whole family and maintains the family living standard.
In general, I firmly believe that sharing houseworks between men and women are advantageous due to the reasons mentioned above. Therefore, family obligations in terms of household activities are suggestible so as to reap the merits of it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-08 | Jenny213987 | 89 | view |
- The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities; Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The money given to help poor countries does not solve the problem of poverty, so rich countries should give other types of help instead.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people think reading stories in books is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think reading stories in books is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Nowadays, most countries improve the standard of living through economic development. But some social values are lost as a result. Do you think th advantages of the phenomenon outweigh the disadvantages? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 208, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...of household activities are suggestible so as to reap the merits of it.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in general, in other words, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68683274021 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30909191238 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626334519573 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8460735506 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.923076923 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241266773312 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744358690153 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536586946681 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141060054249 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480435462686 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.