In many countries today, people buy a range of household goods (TV, microwave, oven and rice cookers). Is it a positive or negative development?
An increasing number of people in buying to electronic products which are convenient for their household chores. In my opinion, this is a positive development and I will give my supportive viewpoints in the essay below.
By being interested in household products, people have improved significantly their life quality. Actually, electronic products have numerous useful functions supporting people do their daily housework more quickly. For instance, the air fryer has been known as a new trend in recent years because it can replace oven in baking and fry food without using cooking oil. Therefore, people can reduce the amount of bad fats and having healthier meals. Another example is the nut milk maker which allow housewife make homemade nut milk such as soyal, almond or walnut milk instead of buying expensive products at stores.
Not only does the demand for household appliances improve human life quality but also contributes to enhance the development of technology. After being aware of the needs for having a more convenient life, electronic companies have researched new technology and introduced the modern and high tech products to customers. One clear example is the evolution of television. From the first black and white televisions in the past century, they have been improved to color televisions then flat screen televisions and they can access to internet like computers nowadays. Secondly, from the financial point of view, a rise in demand for household goods is likely to push up price of products; hence, it benefit businesses and boost economic growth of many countries.
To sum up, buying several household products will have beneficial effects on human life, the technology and the economy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-02 | phuongchi17899 | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-02 | phuongchi17899 | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-02 | phuongchi17899 | 56 | view |
| 2022-01-02 | phuongchi17899 | 56 | view |
| 2021-12-13 | nbaochi14 | 11 | view |
- Water usage in Sydney The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011 73
- The diagram shows the plan of medical center in 2008 and 2010 73
- The diagram below shows one method of manufacturing ceramic pots
- The graph below shows the information of communication technology about percentages of people using different devices in the UK between 1998 and 2008
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: NUT_NOT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'not'?
Suggestion: not
...healthier meals. Another example is the nut milk maker which allow housewife make h...
^^^
Line 3, column 523, Rule ID: NUT_NOT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'not'?
Suggestion: not
...ker which allow housewife make homemade nut milk such as soyal, almond or walnut mi...
^^^
Line 5, column 698, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'benefits'?
Suggestion: benefits
...to push up price of products; hence, it benefit businesses and boost economic growth of...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for instance, such as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31386861314 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74594232728 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631386861314 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9540830939 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133205226631 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482886609566 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364540942128 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0885650151235 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297455995221 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.