Task 2 In many countries today, people buy a range of household goods (TV, microwave, oven and rice cookers). Is it a positive or negative development?
People in many countries pay attention to electronic products which are convenient for their household chores. In my opinion, it is a positive development and I will give my supportive viewpoints in the essay below.
By being interested in household products, people have improved their life quality. Actually, electronic products have numerous useful functions helping people do their daily housework more quickly. For instance, the air fryer has become a new trend in recent years as it can replace oven in baking and fry food without using cooking oil. Therefore, we can reduce the amount of bad fats and having healthier meals.
Not only does the demand for household appliances improve human life quality but also contributes to enhance the development of electronic industry. After being aware of the needs for having a more convenient life, electronic companies have researched and introduced modern products to customers. The evolution of television is the good example to prove it. From the first black and white televisions in the past century, they have been improved to color televisions then flat screen televisions and they can access to internet like computers nowadays. Hence, the innovation of electronic industry and the increase in demand for household goods have boost economic growth of many countries in the world.
In conclusion, buying several household products is a positive development for human life, industry and economy of the world
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-01-02 | phuongchi17899 | 67 | view |
2022-01-02 | phuongchi17899 | 67 | view |
2022-01-02 | phuongchi17899 | 56 | view |
2022-01-02 | phuongchi17899 | 56 | view |
- Some teachers think that international student exchange would be beneficial for all teenage school students Do you think that its advantages would outweigh its disadvantages 61
- A flow chart shows the process of processing wool into cloth Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g Dinosaur dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 56
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011 73
- The most important consideration when choosing any career or job is having a high income To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, hence, if, so, then, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1241.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 231.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37229437229 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79168087917 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1094016689 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.416666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161319490077 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659614341684 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564086459361 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118573810002 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453223487097 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.