In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend?
Nowadays many modern people in metropolises chose to lead a solitary life or in a two-generations family rather than in an extended one. In my opinion, this tendency may bring both negative and positive impacts on each individual
On the one hand, there is a variety of positive effects of living alone or in a small group. First and foremost, the one living solitarily tend to become more independent and responsible for themselves. Although they may suffer from various levels of struggle due to the lack of parental support, their practical life skills such as cookery, house-cleaning or laundry will sharpen significantly. In the second place, there is enhanced privacy. It seems to be shreds of evidence that living alone or in a nuclear family helps people to have more time for themselves. By way of illustrations, preparing meals for a large extended family is quite time-consuming when compared to a conjugal one's meal. Last but not least, there is no age gap in these kinds of households. Therefore, it prevents people from falling into unnecessarily domestic conflicts result from generation differences.
Nevertheless, the negative side of living on one's own or in a nuclear family should not be underestimated. First of all, people isolating from family are at risk of numerous psychological illnesses. Homesickness, desolation or even depression, to mention but a few. Furthermore, they may fall into the overusing of mass media or even drugs with the aim of overcoming their traumas. Secondly, several ancestral customs may fade or even disappear completely. Traditional family meals, which has been replacing with preprocessed or junk food, is a good case in point. Finally, children growing up in nuclear families may suffer from needing of affection. It is apparent that their parent always strives for their work and barely look after them. This is shown by countless many juvenile criminals came from an orphanage or a nuclear family
To sum up, living alone or in a nuclear family can have the advantage of self-independence, increased privacy or preventing age-gap problems. However, it also can bring several mental diseases, eliminating cultural customs or spoiling children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-09 | An Hai Nguyen | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | An Hai Nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | An Hai Nguyen | 61 | view |
| 2022-07-30 | Sukh037 | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-22 | yennguyen189 | 78 | view |
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might be the case Do you think this a positive or negative situation 67
- The Pie chart gives information about the country of birth of people living in Australia and the table shows where people born in these countries live 82
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 90
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, such as, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25779036827 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11685544362 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603399433428 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0748517823 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6842105263 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5789473684 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42105263158 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274375589971 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694645320254 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771953622668 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163878120374 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586052588701 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.