It is important for all towns and cities to have large public spaces such as squares and parks. Do you agree or disagree with this statement
The merits of communal areas including playgrounds or parks are undeniable and from my perspective, I strongly believed that it is essential for all the living regions to have large public spaces due to several explanations following
To begin with, public spaces made contributions to raise people's health. First and foremost, it provided the urban dweller with the areas for physical activities. There seem to be shreds of evidence that citizens in the metropolis often have a shortage of personalized outdoor living spaces. Therefore, it may lead to a sedentary lifestyle. Nevertheless, communal places have avoided this detrimental tendency by being an ideal location for participating in sports games and other recreational activities. Another advantage that worth pointing out is due to the fact that public sites boost environmental qualities. Since it has a wide range of vegetation, these areas serve as a green lung of the metropolis as well as help people diminish the risk of respiratory diseases. Along with the physical well-being, parks and squares are also a good treatment for the psychological ones. According to various specific research, going for a walk and sightseeing in a serenity park have positive impacts on your mental life. It results in mitigate distress from work, social anxiety or even depression
Besides the health functions, sites open to the public also have the commercial as well as spiritual values. On the one hand, it is preserving the traditional and historical monuments. By the way of illustration, several parks nowadays still storing numerous status and steles of the national heroes and leaders. Moreover, since it is free of charge, people are more likely to come and achieve knowledge about their country's glorious history. On the other hand, when it comes to the business, these public places reportedly boost local tourism. It is irrefutable that many foreign visitors choose parks and other playgrounds to pay a visit whenever they want to learn about the local customs as well as behaviour regulations. This has increased the tax revenues for the local government and help create thousands of occupations. The street vendors can be a good case in point
To sum up, the public spaces are beneficial due to a variety of explanations such as raising people's health, improving the environment, as well as preserving the historical markers and boosting the local tourism
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-08-21 | caigicungduoc | 78 | view |
2021-08-21 | caigicungduoc | 78 | view |
2020-10-23 | jennienie | 89 | view |
2020-09-24 | hoangteo0103 | 84 | view |
2020-07-14 | longpm2k | 84 | view |
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015 84
- The Pie chart gives information about the country of birth of people living in Australia and the table shows where people born in these countries live 82
- In some countries around the world men and women are having children late in life What are the reasons for this development What are the effects on society and family life 73
- What are the possible effects of living long on an individual and on the whole society 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es due to several explanations following To begin with, public spaces made contri...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l markers and boosting the local tourism
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, well, as for, such as, as well as, by the way, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2047.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 388.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27577319588 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94300894991 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577319587629 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.7398475531 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.411764706 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8235294118 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1176470588 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223802265201 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591177027732 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588783958993 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136080999228 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536472293015 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.