Many educators belive that international exchange trips are beneficial for students. Do you agree or disagree with this statement.
In this contemporary society, students are offered more opportunitities to participate in international exchange trips. According to many professional teachers, exchange porgrammes bring about different merits to students’ study career. In my point of view, although some drawbacks are inevitable, I believe that kids can enhance their knowledge on a large scale by attending international courses.
On the other hand, there are a number of certain disadvantages related to study overseas. One of the most obvious problems is culture shock. In addition, it is mainly believed that students may witnessed not only different beliefs but also imtypical customes when they get invole in exchange trips. For instance, a Vietnamese student who comes to Korea for advanced study suffers from misunderstanding and conflicts due to different habits. Moreover, many teenagers claim that their study progress is negatively affected after attending international schools. Compared to natives, international students find it difficult to understand sets of theoretical knowledge or vocabularies. Consequently, undesirable academic results may come as an expense, leading to dissatisfaction in children’ s mindset.
Despite the problems described above, I still believe that such exchange opportunities provide young generation with various positive aspects. Firstly, exchange students have more chances to communicate and work with people from over the world, learning different cognitive skills which cannot be comprehended in their native countries. For instance, many students in this contemporary life desire to attend prestigious schools in USA as they are educated in more attractive manners with excellent indigenous students. Secondly, the more time the students spend living in other countries, the more independent they will become. Additionally, without family’s sponsorship, students not only have to learn how to allocate expenditure in an effective way but also cope with cleaning, cooking indepently. This way of living is really beneficial as an overdependence on parents can tremendously cause great harm to adolescents when they grow up and encounter hardship.
Taking everything into consideration, although some drawbacks related to international programmes are inevitable, I still approve with the fact that many benefits can occur after attending oversea courses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-09 | Vadesaer | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-10 | quynhnhi280103 | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-06 | vuongngantrannguyen | 71 | view |
- 35 The following chart shows the amount of tea and coffee imported by Canada UK USA and Germany in 2007 in tonnes 50
- Nowadays more and more women decide to have children later in their life why Does the advantage or disadvantage 78
- 5 The graph shows the development of a particular college capus from 1975 to 2002 and the proposed development of 2020 44
- A 4 week holiday can make employees do better at job To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- The table and pie chart give information about population in Australia according to different nationalilites and areas 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 732, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ve to learn how to allocate expenditure in an effective way but also cope with cleaning, cooking in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, still, for instance, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2043.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95626822157 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27067447086 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623906705539 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3199063792 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.176470588 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1764705882 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.29411764706 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248029901406 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726436148634 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541109339986 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143348354767 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407348616193 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.