Many employers are looking for people with good social skills as well as good qualifications. Are social skills as important as qualifications? How could this be a problem?
Nowadays, both strong job-related skills and social abilities are highly valued by companies. I firmly agree with this issue to some extent, meanwhile, the factors will be elucidated in the subsequenting paragraph.
On the one hand, solid interpersonal skills in employees would bring several merits, firstly, people tend to long for valuable assets by way of great personal branding which become indispensable to attractive positions in a company. For instance, paralinguistic features including intonation range and loudness play a key to success during interview sessions, thus, speaking enthusiastically can convey a candidate’s genuine interest in the position. Moreover, certain employers might implement a grading system for industrial engineering job applicants to likely ensure the requisite technical expertise when performing day-to-day work. Following this, strict SOPs and professional certificates (welding engineer and inspector) qualify employees to have the required competencies for their roles.
Regarding the causes, the high levels of hostile workplace among employees stem from discrimination and social disparity, hindering good relationships in the workplace. As seen in India work culture, a pervasive system issue where seniority and gender discrimination reigns supreme and demands of junior employees become an inescapable problem. In addition, maintaining standards in a rapidly evolving era of globalisation, companies face fierce rivalry and continuously adapt to technological and market changes. Evidently, in this cutting-edge era, nearly every business necessitates digital marketing on social media platforms with the current qualification in place, exacerbating workers to experience heightened stress levels and struggle with job demand.
In conclusion, from my perspective, strong interpersonal skills and qualifications in the workplace would bring substantially advantageous aspects ranging from precious individuals to distinct requirements. Nonetheless, the reasons are rising workplace incivility and imposing further details of job requirements.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-15 | MEBC Class | 89 | view |
- Nowadays most children prefer to spend several hours playing with electronic devices over doing more traditional leisure activities What problem does this cause What do you think are possible solutions 80
- Companies spend millions each year on advertising online in magazines and on billboards These adverts can encourage people to buy goods that they do not really need What are the positive and negative effects of consumerism 89
- Some people think the manufacturers and shopping malls should sell fewer packaged products while others argue that people have the responsibility to buy products with less packaging Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- The leaders of most organisations tend to be older people However some argue that younger people make better bosses To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The rise of social media platforms has made it easier for people to vent their frustrations and complaints publicly What is the consequence of this trend Is there any benefit to expressing complaints on social media 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...ilities are highly valued by companies. I firmly agree with this issue to some ex...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, nonetheless, regarding, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1814.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.34265734266 5.12529762239 124% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38246189365 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.713286713287 0.561755894193 127% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7190182545 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.166666667 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220877259175 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622479948469 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457608171675 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112878207435 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341141957527 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.3 13.0946893788 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.79 12.4159519038 159% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.84 8.58950901804 138% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.