Studies have shown that many criminals have a low level of education. For this reason, some people believe that the best way to reduce crime is to educate people in prison so that they can get a job when they leave. Do you agree or disagree?
Some journals have revealed that poor education causes problems related to education. Many people believe that to improve the better living of offenders, educational experience has to be provided during the imprisonment period. I am partially in accord with the statement under some circumstances which will be the topic of discussion.
The first primary opinion, providing the criminals with the education seems unacceptable on account of the superfluous state budget which can be allocated to the urgent matters, building more prison rooms. The limited rooms of prisons resulting in overcrowded surroundings prompt the low rate of cleanliness. The lack of environmental hygiene causes numerous infectious diseases, such as Tuberculosis. Furthermore, in view of applying for jobs, a criminal record becomes a great issue for ex-perpetrators to meet the qualifications of companies’ recruitment. It is evidence that those in the United States who experienced incarceration receive less than $10.000 per year income jobs which might not fulfil their daily needs exacerbating severe violations to survive.
In contrast with the aforementioned point, providing further education, counseling programs, such as what University of Southern Queensland establishes in terms of helping women prisoners to pursue their careers (being entrepreneurs of continuing studies). If the programs worked well, it would change the prejudice from the society towards them. To state further, the more diverse the training programs are conducted by the government, the more skilled the convicted persons will be. Following this, Australia’s government provides the offenders with training programs aiming to ease job search including a baker and barber.
In conclusion, it is clear to me that education is beneficial for convicted persons, delivering certain advantages, including to support them to have further careers and to enhance specific skills. This is as long as the government keeps developing its main prison facilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-13 | MEBC Class | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-24 | linghuongchuhabcdefghiu | 56 | view |
- In many countries people now wear Western style dresses such as suits and jeans rather than traditional clothing Why is this Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Some people think we do not need museums any more in the modern world Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 80
- Some young people like to copy the behaviour and clothes of famous people today Why might this be the case What problems can it cause 89
- Some people feel that cities should allow for spaces for graffiti while others feel it should be banned Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...rovided during the imprisonment period. I am partially in accord with the stateme...
^
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ngs prompt the low rate of cleanliness. The lack of environmental hygiene causes nu...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, well, as to, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1720.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77181208054 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17526275927 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677852348993 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9601313273 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.857142857 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167516339588 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522566380098 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474821627591 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102060780522 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511366207189 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...rovided during the imprisonment period. I am partially in accord with the stateme...
^
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ngs prompt the low rate of cleanliness. The lack of environmental hygiene causes nu...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, well, as to, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1720.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77181208054 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17526275927 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677852348993 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9601313273 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.857142857 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167516339588 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522566380098 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474821627591 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102060780522 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511366207189 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.