Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists, not local people. Why? What can be done to attract local people?
Nowadays, only few visitors in museums and heritage attractions are made up by native people. At the same time, however, there is some uncertainty as to the causes of this problem and how it might be resolved. In this essay, I will examine the issue and seek some possible solutions.
To begin with, in regard to causes, it is undeniable that the high price of tickets would drive natives away. For example, some Chinese tourist attractions may charge lots of money while Chinese residents may be familiar with these places and the price is obviously unreasonable, so they are not willing to pay for it. In addition, the museums and historical sites’ bad services may push local people away. Compared to other entertainment facilities, tourist attractions have bad services which really annoy local people so they choose to go other places as a result.
On the other hand, as to solutions, the government should make it free for local people to visit the museums and historical sites. As the financial burden is alleviated, the local tourist attractions, though familiar, would still be a good choice for local people. Furthermore, the administrators of these places ought to improve their services. For instance, they should set more entrances so that the local people will not be crowded by other tourists outside the gate of a museum.
To summarize, there is no doubt that the high ticket price and the bad services of the museum and heritage sites lead to the fact that local people are unwilling to go for these places. At the same time, nevertheless, the government should set free ticket and the supervisor of these places need to take some actions to show a better service.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-23 | Frank Chen | 67 | view |
| 2015-02-09 | mayoiko | 60 | view |
- In the modern society, some people think that people are becoming more and more independent, while other people believe that they are more dependent. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 67
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 56
- some people think that good health is important to everyone, so medical services should not be run by profit-making companies. Do the disadvantages of private health care outweigh the advantages? 61
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, may, nevertheless, really, so, still, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, no doubt, as a result, in regard to, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91608391608 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6853784229 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520979020979 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1675206588 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.153846154 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0769230769 7.06120827912 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260417869717 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994454870997 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895769544246 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154307671398 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744012793294 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.