Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
It is true that various museums and historic landmarks are attractive to foreign tourists but not the natives. Reasons for this vary, and steps need to be taken to tackle the problem.
Firstly, the tediousness is partially to blame. The locals have already known everything about historical sites or museums in their city. As such people must have learned about all their historical stories, objects and artifacts through narrative stories or textbooks, museums in the proximity are not compelling anymore. In contrast, those historical attractions offer tourists a chance to embrace local cultures, traditions and the history of the development of this country. Thus, a trip to a museum is a recreational activity for visitors to explore different parts of the world.
Another reason stems from the fact that a significant number of museums and historical sites remain unchanged in a long time. Inspirational activities about history are lacking and several museums are under no renovation. Therefore, all those things discourage native people from visiting their historic destinations. Instead, the locals prefer to spend their leisure time at shopping malls, theaters or interesting places.
The problem described above is not intractable. The simplest measure is that the government should lend museums or historical attractions a new look. They should rearrange objects about history, and tell more stories about the national one that locals may have never heard. This will result in arm native people with more knowledge of their roots. Another remedy is that the state should liven up their historic buildings by investing in the renovation of the construction of such attractions or doing more fascinating activities of learning history.
In conclusion, the tedium of historical sites and lack of significant changes in museums over the years is attributable to several reasons. This issue can be handled by adopting the above-mentioned solutions.
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages? 84
- In the future, it seems more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 67
- Prison is a common way in most countries to solve the problem of crime. However, a more effective solution is to provide people a better education. Do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eed to be taken to tackle the problem. Firstly, the tediousness is partially ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...alls, theaters or interesting places. The problem described above is not int...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing activities of learning history. In conclusion, the tedium of historical ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, in contrast, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50825082508 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90824438321 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57095709571 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1450310517 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7222222222 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8333333333 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27777777778 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294603295198 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840919189745 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506148438853 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159510790312 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0200731654293 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.