Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
The tourism sector of many countries has to face a popular issue that many museums and historical attractions are concerned by the significant number of exotic tourists rather than domestic residents. While there are some reasons for this trend, some interventions should be implemented to raise the number of indigenous visitors.
In terms of causes, there are two primary reasons that many tourism areas are facing. Firstly, native dwellers easily have a sense of boredom with attractions which are quite familiar with them in daily lives. Native museums and historical areas clearly are thronged with foreigners, who are provided with strange and exciting things, whereas such things are not different from somethings in inhabitants’ routine. Secondly, people who are in charge of advertisements usually tend to be more concerned about foreign visitors than inhabitants. For example, Suoi Tien theme park offers its services with an exorbitant fee, which usually is inappropriate with native people.
Nevertheless, local governments can tackle this issue in some ways. Firstly, authorities should allocate more resources on refreshing the exhibits. Consequently, nonstop efforts in order to innovate local museums and attractions can increase curiosity for native customers. Secondly, traveling fees should be regulated at an affordable extent to attract people who settle down in the surrounding areas. It is clear people usually desire to broaden their horizons, and therefore, an appropriate expenditure is really a motivation to enable inhabitants to visit historical sites near them.
In conclusion, while there are some obstacles leading native customers do not want to spent on familiar exhibitions, local governments can raise the number of local visitors by affordable prices and continuous innovations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-02 | thaotanya | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-28 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | Chau Anaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaâ | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-25 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-20 | mbn250 | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table shows the usage charge for water and the average bill per household in five cities 66
- The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012. 73
- the chart below shows the percentage of male and female who did various free time activities in England in 2006 82
- In many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects What are the causes And what will be the effects on society 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70220588235 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98271902484 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602941176471 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7389350233 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.307692308 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0769230769 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257184900535 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081805108792 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515192910653 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147823994205 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787587650965 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.