Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited bt tourists, not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract local people?
There are many museums and historical viewpoints in our city that are worth visiting. Although these spots are popular for the visitors, local citizens barely visit them. The reason behind this phenomenon is mainly because tourists's mind can be opened by visiting the sites. Both the government and schools can raise the visiting rate of local people.
For all the reasons why foreigners love to visit our museums and historical sites, none are as significant as the fact that they can broaden their horizon by doing so. As the culture in our city may be diametrically different to the visitors’ home countries, their horizons will be broadened and their minds will be open. They could learn how to appreciate others' culture instead of being stubborn and insist that their culture is more superior than others. Every culture has its unique characteristic and there are things that are worth learning. By visiting the local museums and sites, tourists can have a better understanding of our culture. In this manner, the local museums and sites are becoming more and more prevalent for visitors these days.
In order to attract local citizens, there are steps that the government and schools can take. First, the government can hold competitions to draw attention of the public. For example, a contest of designing slogans of viewing sites with prices that can attract people and by participating in the contest, people can understand the place itself or even the story behind it. This can trigger their interests of the viewing point and they may tend to visit the place. Moreover, schools can educate students about our local culture. Students are in at a tender age with impressionable minds that can be easily educated. By this means, teaching them the beauty of the local culture can be most effective. Schools can organise a tour, for the children, which show the importance of understanding our own culture. If they are interested in our culture and gained the sense of self-belonging to the city, the visiting rate of museums and sites will be boosted.
Under this line of thinking, museums and historical sites are more common for foreign tourists to visit because they can open their mind and broaden their sight of view. To attract locals to visit them, both the government and schools have the responsibility to take various steps.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-02 | Jason021112 | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-11 | Jack koh | 74 | view |
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports Why is it Is it a postivive or negative development 73
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports Why is it Is it a positive or negative development 73
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited bt tourists not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract local people 67
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports Why is it Is it a positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 431, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[2]
Message: The adjective more is normally used with to and does not need 'more' (so called implicit comparative). Probably you need to write: 'superior to'.
Suggestion: superior to
...ubborn and insist that their culture is more superior than others. Every culture has its unique ch...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, moreover, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1960.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 391.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01278772379 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6214422054 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473145780051 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.0 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0946098701 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3333333333 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.619047619 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.95238095238 7.06120827912 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371924484936 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116920355472 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600018083943 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249540226813 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359893934663 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.