Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists, not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract local people?
It is true that historical places and museums attract a large number of tourists; however, local residents show little interest in it. This essay will discuss the causes of this phenomenon and what measures could be done to attract locals.
To begin with, people find it boring to visit the local museum and historical buildings. As the local people already familiar with their culture and history and perhaps have nothing new to discover by visiting these sites repeatedly. Therefore, they avoid visiting these places as they may consider such visiting as a waste of time. Tourists, on the other hand, are eager to explore the new places of interesting in their destination, and museum and historic sites will help them have a better understanding of the culture and history of the countries they are visiting. Another reason is that museums normally charge an entry fee which could be the main factor that discourages the local people. If a person has visited it once they will avoid visiting it again because nobody wants to pay again to watch the same artwork.
Governments can take steps to encourage local people to attend museums and historic buildings. Firstly, the authorities can organize the cultural event and regular exhibition at these places to provide people with a new experience every time they visit them. The second solution could be offering free or discount tickets at the weekend or some special days so that the low income or middle-income families could visit. For example, the school can provide assignments related to the history of a country, and this will motivate parents to take their children to the historical museum to collect useful information which will help them overcome in their studies.
In conclusion, this essay argued the reasons for local residents less likely to visit museums and historic sites and what action that governments can take to encourage people to visit more.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-02 | Jason021112 | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-11 | Jack koh | 74 | view |
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 65
- Some people say the government should give health care the first priorities some others believe there are more important priorities to spend the taxpayers money Discuss both views and give your own opinion 69
- The charts below compare the age structure of the populations of France and India in 1984. 84
- The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled PMT by transportation type in 2002 92
- In some countries, the criminal trials are shown on the TV and the general public can watch them. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...t historical places and museums attract a large number of tourists; however, local residents show...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in fact, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11041009464 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54138099487 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526813880126 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6455602552 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.615384615 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3846153846 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6153846154 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417651006964 0.244688304435 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15640301081 0.084324248473 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899431429076 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277410218791 0.151304729494 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509131579116 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.