Many museums charge for admission while others are free.
Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
It is commonly believed that museums should charge for entrance. In contrast, many people advocate that, in order to foment population interest, museums must be costless and profit from advertisement. I strongly think that there are better strategies to increase revenue.
On the one hand, most museums are private facilities, so the owners and investors usually need to make a profit from it. Moreover, only by having regular income can museums maintain their expenses. For example, showcasing an exhibition requires a proper infrastructure, lighting, art specialists and interior design, to name a few. Therefore, charging for admission is an obvious solution to keep the high standards. However, in my opinion, there are more drawbacks in charging the entrance fee than benefits.
On the other hand, in the past decades, museums has been loosing its popularity. This is probably due to the unprecedented variety of costless activities available nowadays. In simple terms, what people want is to enjoy their free time without paying for it. As a consequence, rarely will people be keen about spending money on museums if they can watch a movie or a YouTube video for free at home. Hence, I believe museums can ameliorate their profit by other measures, avoiding diminishing even more public interest. For instance, many private companies, specially online, make money with publicity campaigns and deliver entertainment out of cost to the viewers.
To conclude, charging a fee to the visitor is a counterproductive way of increasing the income when it comes to a decadent entertainment. I my opinion the disadvantages overcomes the advantages.
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- In many countries the tradition of families having meals together is disappearing. Why is this happen? What will be the effects of it to the family and to the society? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 278, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'rarely' is usually put between 'will' and 'people'.
Suggestion: will rarely people
...ithout paying for it. As a consequence, rarely will people be keen about spending money on museums...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in contrast, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36153846154 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08478802509 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653846153846 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2572106497 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.125 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353160049388 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964427731086 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696875568548 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18539868474 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643431581156 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.