In many nations, people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units, instead of a large, extended family. Is this a positive or negative trend?
It has been observed that citizens in urban centers prefer to be singletons or live with their small-sized families rather than with their extended families. Considering the benefits in terms of freedom and finance, I believe that this is a positive trend.
Forefront among the advantages of the life of a singleton is freedom of choice as multigenerational families often experience conflicts of lifestyles. For instance, young members of the family, due to their newfound employment, may come home late often and bother their seniors, who expect the young ones to be home on time for family meals. Regular quarrels over such differences cause not only inconvenience for both sides but also affect family bonds. By contrast, living alone or in small family units enables people to have more control over their life and reduce avoidable conflicts with other family members.
In addition, it should be remarked that living independently in big cities could make better financial sense, since housing and living expenses tend to be costly in these areas. In Vietnam, the old quarter near the city center often sees families of 10 cramping in tiny rundown apartments. In these places, residents often deal with a range of issues such as the lack of clean water supplies and expensive electricity bills, which could lower their quality of life. Opting for a single life or a small family is a sensible solution to these problems, giving people better living conditions.
A popular argument against this modern trend is that it increases feelings of isolation for singletons and weakens family ties. However, these psychological issues could be tackled in different ways, ranging from going out with friends to paying a monthly visit to other family members.
In conclusion, opting for the life of a singleton or in small family units is a beneficial development.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 84
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing.Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages ? 61
- Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down. Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals.Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion. 84
- Some people prefer to provide help or support directly to the local community. Others prefer to give money to national or international charitable organizations. Discuss both and give opinion 84
- There are many people who go to live in different countries. To what extent should people be allowed to move freely between countries and live where they choose? What are the benefits and drawbacks of this?Give reasons for your answer and include any rele 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 506, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t, living alone or in small family units enables people to have more control over...
^^
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'cramping' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'cramps'.
Suggestion: cramps
...e city center often sees families of 10 cramping in tiny rundown apartments. In these pl...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...10 cramping in tiny rundown apartments. In these places, residents often deal with...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17491749175 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73498411564 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594059405941 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6002958565 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.615384615 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201335198325 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076695285795 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486946837635 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113617683052 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312766619544 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.