It is true that families were larger in the past due to having more children. In my opinion, both drawbacks and benefits are brought forward
On the one hand, having many offspring presents a number of advantages. Firstly, it is claimed that a family with members can possibly have a more enjoyable life. Children having other sisters or brothers will never be lonely or unhappy as they can rely and share many things with their siblings. Secondly, due to being a part of a big family, kids can grow many social skills. For instance, children can have experiences to know how to take care of others or be polite when talking to older people. Furthermore, each offspring of a family will become more and more responsible.
However, no one can ever deny the enormous and obvious limitations of having too many children. First of all, growing more than two kids in a family makes the population exponentially grow. As a consequence, there will be no more living land and colleges shall be overloaded. Moreover, having so many children will make the situation more complex to parents. Bringing up too many offspring causes the difficulties in finance for parents as they have to pay for many people at the same time, which leads to the result that mothers and fathers have to work harder but earn less; therefore; living standard will be significantly limited
In conclusion, although both pros and cons are observed, I suppose families should have less kids in order to develop their life standard as well as reduce the population growth rate
- Modern forms of communication such as email and messaging have reduced the amount of time people spend seeing their friends. This has had a negative effect on their social lives.What extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and includ 84
- The media pay too much attention to the lives and relationships of celebrities such as actors singers or footballers They should spend more time reporting the lives of ordinary people 84
- Modern forms of communication such as email and messaging have reduced the amount of time people spend seeing their friends. This has had a negative effect on their social lives.What extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and includ 84
- The Internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few decades Although some of these changes have been negative the overall effect of this technology has been positive what are your opinions on this 78
- Task 2 Men and women are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses It is right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...t is claimed that a family with members can possibly have a more enjoyable life. Children ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun kids is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...bserved, I suppose families should have less kids in order to develop their life sta...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, i suppose, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.875 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6275294997 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598484848485 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 102.267996243 49.4020404114 207% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 107.25 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.5833333333 7.06120827912 221% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233106336413 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106072143032 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823025379317 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149295408262 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740688304477 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.