During the era of information technology, many innovative forms of communication have been developed such as email or messaging. People claim that those communicating programs do bad effects on individuals’ the social life as they change way we communicate with friends. However, not only modern communication does negative effects on the people.
On the one hand, it is clear that several disadvantages of online communication does exist. Firtsly, the more often people use email, the less time they have to converse with others. As a result, people’s communication ability will be obviously worsen, which makes them find it hard to integrate with the community and their verbalization skills will be worse and worse. Secondly, expression misjudge are likely to be observed. Since the limitation of online communicating systems is facial interaction, people who use Viber or Zalo, for instance, may feel uncomfortable when their online pen pal can possibly misunderstand what they really want to express. This problem is quite common because a person’s thought must be deliveried by both words and emotions.
On the other hand, it is quite personal and illogical to argue that people’s social lives are negatively effected by modern communication. Some individuals use email or messaging just because these communicating systems are beneficial and satisfy their personal requirements. For example, due to distance, sending a lightning fast letter by Gmail or Yahoo mail is much more comfortable. Moreover, there are many other aspects such as video games, social network or even society’s vices that should be blame for negative affects on the the public’s social lives.
In conclusion, although modern forms of communication perform some drawbacks, it is completely mistaken to suppose that only those programs are the reason of the changes of the community’s cocial activities
- The Internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few decades Although some of these changes have been negative the overall effect of this technology has been positive what are your opinions on this 78
- In many parts of the world, families were larger in the past because people had more children. Do you think there were more advantages or disadvantages to being part of a large family in the past?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examp 61
- Task 2 Men and women are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses It is right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender
- Modern forms of communication such as email and messaging have reduced the amount of time people spend seeing their friends. This has had a negative effect on their social lives.What extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and includ 84
- The media pay too much attention to the lives and relationships of celebrities such as actors singers or footballers They should spend more time reporting the lives of ordinary people 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 602, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...uncomfortable when their online pen pal can possibly misunderstand what they really want to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 511, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'blamed'?
Suggestion: blamed
...ven society's vices that should be blame for negative affects on the the public...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... vices that should be blame for negative affects on the the public's social ...
^^
Line 3, column 542, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...hould be blame for negative affects on the the public's social lives. In conclus...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 542, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...hould be blame for negative affects on the the public's social lives. In conclus...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, even so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57534246575 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27523332178 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623287671233 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5690576523 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.285714286 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5714285714 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270844450666 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865311632725 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480257745796 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158601627833 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571085057341 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.