Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers. Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers. Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Some people believe that one of the ways to improve educational quality is encouraging students to give their opinion about their teacher but others believe that this method has negative effects on education environments. I would argue that giving students feedback is a useful method to improve teaching methods and materials.
From the perspective of some people, criticizing teachers by students could lead to a lack of discipline and respect in the classroom and could turn to the playground for revengeful students. They argue that it is impractical to satisfy all students so this only leads to chaos due to the massive number of comments.
But there are several benefits to allow students to criticize and make comments on their teachers. Firstly, teachers should be evaluated by students to be able to improve their teaching skills and contents. For example, without feedback from students, it would be difficult to know that speed of the class is appropriate or not. Secondly, when students give the right to criticize their course and teachers, they become more motivated and they may engage and listen during class more carefully. And finally, this method helps students to develop criticism. Criticizing a course is a good start to learn how to create useful feedback. So those students would be self-critic and they could improve themselves. In order to prevent the problems mentioned above, the evaluation should be implemented carefully and should emphasize the class materials and teaching methods rather than a person. A positive and peaceful environment should be created before evaluation and students should be polite and as natural as possible.
In conclusion, I believe that if the evaluation is implemented in a positive environment, it could bring benefits for both students and teaches, therefore, students should be allowed to criticize the teachers and class materials.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-13 | MinhJoyluv | 87 | view |
| 2023-04-23 | thanh1927540 | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | thanh1927540 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | thanh1927540 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | thanh1927540 | 67 | view |
- getting promotions are one of the biggest motivations for hard work in the modern workplace Why are people so driven to receive promotions what other factors motivate people to work hard 84
- The internet means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- study literature 73
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate Discuss both views and give your own opinion 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31700288184 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80317700603 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489913544669 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7614878687 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.529411765 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4117647059 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395808290344 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135014235333 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136906964295 0.0667982634062 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276157248317 0.151304729494 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.239252915829 0.056905535591 420% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.