Many people believe that cities should not try to preserve its old historic buildings and instead, they should destroy them and replace them with modern buildings.
To what extent do you agree?
Many historical buildings are suggested to be replaced instead of preserved. But to me, I strongly believe that these constructions should be kept as their original and only fix the parts that have been damaged.
First of all, these buildings are not just old, rusty buildings but they are special because of their historical meaning. Those meanings are what can’t be suspended. When we replace them with modern buildings, not only do they lose the ancient structures but also the memories that connect strictly to those historical events. Historic constructions are undeniable, truthful witnesses about the past . For example, the Independent place located in the middle of Sai Gon. The place is enormous so it uses a lot of land. But we can’t not tear it down, but it’s a strong, powerful symbol to the Vietnamese as a mark of complete freedom from hundreds of years of being dominated. Each construction has its own value, and has its own meaning to a certain group of people. They are memories, beliefs, ways to say goodbye to the good old days and the method to hold our beliefs. That is why it can not be suspended by cutting-edge buildings.
Secondly, historical buildings also appear to educate youngsters. For instance, the Con Dao prison’s existence is to remind people about all the hard work that Vietnamese soldiers had been through in order to save the country. It appears so that the soldiers' legendary sacrifices will live on, and to educate the young generation to follow their hirotic steps and contribute to the nation. Not only do historical sites bring education purposes but they also bring prospilities to a country. In Particular, they have a huge contribution to the income in tourism. Famous attractions or historic structures are never missed while visiting a new country. That is why the appearance of those constructions will gain a gigantic advantage to tourism. Tourism can sell tickets to visit these places or develop more conveniences near those locations. All those actions have economical effects on nation wealth. And also historic sites will also raise visitors' curiosity and help them understand more about the country’s history, culture as well as religion.
To that extent, historical buildings are and will never be replaced by modern conveniences due to their meaningful and economical purpose. Instead, we should perverse, protect and cherish those constructions with all our hearts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-26 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-26 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-26 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-26 | nguyendangquang.aspect | view | |
| 2021-09-14 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
- Space exploration is a waste of money Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people believe that women should play an equal role as men in a country s police force or military force while others think women are not suitable for these kinds of jobs Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In some countries parents are choosing to teach children themselves at home instead of sending them to school Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people think that individuals who make a lot of money are most successful Others think that those who contribute to society like scientists and teachers are most successful Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 400, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...iable, truthful witnesses about the past . For example, the Independent place loca...
^^
Line 2, column 527, Rule ID: CONTRACTED_FORM_NOT[1]
Message: You used a negation after a negated contracted verb. Did you mean simply 'can’t'?
Suggestion: can’t
...ormous so it uses a lot of land. But we can’t not tear it down, but it’s a strong, powerf...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in particular, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2045.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 397.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15113350126 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85030622914 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554156171285 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6618498026 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2083333333 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5416666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249788689513 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621905631682 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070340358644 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169622736824 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049468826061 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.