Many people believe that cities should not try to preserve its old historic buildings and instead, they should destroy them and replace them with modern buildings.
To what extent do you agree?
It is generally that there are some individuals who think ancient structure need to be destroyed and replaced by modern buildings. In my opinion, even though the social need to be developed and become better, I don’t really expect this thing by removing historic building.
Moreover, the ancient building need to be replaced for many reason. First of all, there are many people who can not relies of the importance of the history from these buildings. Beside that, the surface of the earth is limited and they need to do as best as they can in order to save more region for their child. That’s why the modern buildings which can be more helpful for the people’s life must be built.
In my view, it is not necessary to do this thing while we can make money from them. For example, my mother spent 2 years at French and the thing attracted her most is the Eiffel tower which took her a little bit money go to the highest place of this tower. Making money is not the only thing can keep these buildings exist, they are also the evidence to prove a historic event in the history of a country.
Overall, even though some individuals want to replace these buildings by the better one for the social’s purpose, I don’t really agree with them because of the historical and financial value.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-09-26 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
2021-09-26 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 56 | view |
2021-09-26 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 56 | view |
2021-09-26 | nguyendangquang.aspect | view | |
2021-09-14 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
- The chart and graph below give the information about three categories of workers in Australia in 1991 and unemployment levels within those categories in three countries between 1991 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 89
- The maps below compare 2 floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the UK the rest of Europe and Japan from 1993 to 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar charts show the water levels of 6 cities in Australia Darwin 1 Sydney 2 Melbourne 3 Brisbane 4 Perth 5 and Canberra 6 in October 2009 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva
- Freshwater is a limited resource in certain regions of the world Today the escalating demand has transformed it into a global problem What are the causes of the increasing demand What measures can governments and individuals take to respond to the problem 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'many reasons'.
Suggestion: many reasons
...ncient building need to be replaced for many reason. First of all, there are many people wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...st is the Eiffel tower which took her a little bit money go to the highest place of this t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, really, so, while, for example, first of all, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 1615.20841683 66% => OK
No of words: 232.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61637931034 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35004727733 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560344827586 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 506.74238477 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5458386509 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.1 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190339760364 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811356012684 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489316633852 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116879713855 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469057072571 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 50.2224549098 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 78.4519038076 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.