Many people believe the government should spend money on faster public transport. Others think that money should be spent on different aspects of public transportation, such as cost reduction and environmental conservation. Discuss both views . Give your opinion and include examples from your experience.
An efficient public transport system is essential for people living in a metropolitan region. There is an ongoing debate about whether to invest in making it faster or to make it cheaper and eco- friendly. I agree with the latter argument because this approach will help save money and improve healthy.
With a high- speed transportation system, people will reach their destinations in less time. Consequently, there will be spare time at the end of the day which could be utilized positively for playing sports, doing community work, and talking to friends and family. The result of this will be a happy and healthy community. In addition to spending excess time on transport, low speed buses and trans force people to leave easily for work and reach their destinations late. The result of this physical and mental exhaustion, which will negatively affect the quality of life.
Turning to other side of the argument, an affordable and environment friendly means of transport can benefit financially and improve the local climate. Since living in an urban area is expensive, a cheap way to move around will prevent an unnecessary erosion of savings. Furthermore, taking steps, such as using renewable energy to power buses and trains, will reduce the harmful effects of human transport on the environment. This will prevent the emission of toxic and green- house gases such as carbon monoxide which are released by vehicles. Eventually, this will improve the health of the local population.
In conclusion, although high speed public transport system will free up a lot of time, I believe that alternatives that are cheaper and less harmful to the environment should be funded by the government as this will cut the cost of living in cities as well as decrease pollution to the area.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-16 | Sandeep@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-17 | Russportkz | 95 | view |
- Most people accept that we now live in a globalisation world but not everyone agree that this is beneficial. To what extent is globalisation a positive or negative development? 84
- Some people believe that managers are responsible for the organization's success. While other think various features of the organization play a vital role in it. Discusboth views and give your opinion. 61
- Some people believe that managers are responsible for the organization's success. While other think various features of the organization play a vital role in it. Discusboth views and give your opinion. 61
- It is generally accepted that exercise is good for children and teenagers. Therefore, physical education cans sport should be compulsory for all students in all schools . What do you think? 73
- Many people believe the government should spend money on faster public transport. Others think that money should be spent on different aspects of public transportation, such as cost reduction and environmental conservation. Discuss both views . Give your 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the harmful effects of human transport on the environment. This will prevent th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, if, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05743243243 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71564258767 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581081081081 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0642852593 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.928571429 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141647579097 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466928992917 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415064176587 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094095570925 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381340570131 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.