Nowadays, due to globalization, a significant increase in the number of overseas tourism is witnessed. Although the obvious benefits it brings to the development of a country, residents argue that the growth in the number of tourism affect negatively to the local habitat. In my opinion, the government play a vital role in the reducing of these prejudices.
To begin with, due to the low-level awareness of the minority tourists, the local resident afraid that it will affect negatively to the environment which threatens their habitat. For example, a substantial rise is witnessed in the number of waste products into water such as lakes and rivers which is the water source of the whole village. Thus, drinking such an contaminated water cause numerous serious disease. Furthermore, an overwhelming in the number of tourists also shorten the lifetime of some ancient building.
In my opinion, visiting a new country not only help an individual gain valuable experience and unforgettable memories but also contributing to boosting the national economy. Therefore, the government should take actions to not only improve the reputation of tourist attraction places but also diminish the prejudice from residents. First, promoting a campaign to raise the local resident awareness about the opportunities that tourism brings should be on top of the priorities. For example, the more visitors the more opportunities for local people to do business such as selling food, souvenir or renting a shared house, which helps them earn more money to improve the living standard. On the other hand, a more careful supervision and appropriate actions from local police officers also play an important role to prevent the harmful actions to the environment from visitors.
In conclusion, the advantages that tourism brings to a country is unquestionable. However, to reduce the prejudice from local residents, the government should raise the visitor's awareness and have an appropriate punishment if any harmful action to the local habitat is detected.
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes? 73
- Some people think that there is a great influence of news media on people’s lives and this is a negative development. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and relevant examples. 76
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 56
- Some people think that studying from the past teaches us nothing about today’s life. Others argue that the history is a value source of information. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 79
- As the number of people who live in cities continues to increase the number of children who are raised in cities also has increased Some people believe that raising a child in a large city brings many advantages Meanwhile other people claim that it has ma 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... the whole village. Thus, drinking such an contaminated water cause numerous serio...
^^
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the lifetime of some ancient building. In my opinion, visiting a new country no...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 170, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'visitors'' or 'visitor's'?
Suggestion: visitors'; visitor's
...idents, the government should raise the visitors awareness and have an appropriate punis...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.403125 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01437798051 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4724748626 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1428571429 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.080281130765 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0286020634188 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335343389033 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0516527484539 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244549739008 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.