Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes.

Over the last decade, International tourism has gained a lot of popularity, mainly because it allows travellers to explore a different culture combined with natural attractions like lakes, mountains and beaches surrounded by favourable climate. However, some residents oppose this rise in the number of tourists visiting them, they have some valid reasons for this which should be addressed.

Firstly, the inhabitants feel that tourism impacts their culture adversely, for example, late night clubs, in-appropriate clothing and certain conducts of tourists are not well accepted. The residents always have a fear that this would lead to a cultural damage and impact the traditions. Secondly, during the peak season, the tourist spots become highly crowded thereby causing congestion and overpricing of daily needs products. And finally, the tourists are directly and indirectly damaging the ecosystem of the area, the high footfall is encouraging massive commercial activities impacting the environment especially in mountains quite known for its serenity. It is known that the excessive usage of plastic packaged products like cold drinks, mineral water, fast food etc. are chocking the earth already and these visitors are major contributors to it.

All the above facts are good enough to justify the growing negativity towards international tourism, however, following steps must be taken to ensure that this industry remains unaffected. Governments can put a restriction on the number of tourist visas to avoid the crowds, especially during peak timings. The second solution is that governments issue an advisory for visiting tourists to respect the local traditions. A ban of plastics and proper garbage collection along with limiting the uncontrolled commercial activities can save the environment to a certain extent.
In conclusion, the international tourism is attracting negative views of inhabitants due to its disadvantages and countermeasures are need of the hour to handle this situation.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, as to, for example, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68438538206 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99110722682 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637873754153 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2905408063 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.615384615 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122719809113 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0382508604237 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399863380338 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0791002104328 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019470828314 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.