Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes
It is widely believed that foreign travel industry is an awful concept or a host country. There are numerous possible explanations for this belief; therefore several distinct solutions will be agreed upon to solve the altitude.
Generally, foreign tourism receive criticism because of two main reasons. Firstly, without fully comprehending the traditions and customs of the host country, travelers from overseas will surely make certain false moves. Although they misunderstand – or be unconscious of – the nation; its people would eventually find their behaviors offensive and disrespectful; and that they show no appreciation towards their culture. For example, wearing miniskirts into pagodas in Vietnam, or eating by left hand in India, or biting nails in China, is considered rude and extremely odd. Secondly, not only infuriating locals by sullying the indigenous practices, foreigners tend to contaminate the surrounding environment with every sightings they visit. After tourists leave any place, they always dispose garbage behind. It is obvious that they are well awared of environmental laws – but foreigners choose to be ignorant.
However, some measures can be taken to alter the negative views of indigenous people towards international tourism. The elementary alteration to make is that authorities ought to impose strict regulations on environmental behaviors. Reasonable amount of fines therefore should be paid given that the foreigners endamage the neighborhood. Moreover, trash disposal limited or strongly prohibited in public sightings. Another solution to the problem is to train tour guides to acknowledge the customs of their country. If he/she guides a group of visitors, he/she must explain every note-worthy fact about his/her host country that they might want to bear in mind.
In conclusion, various reasons cause negative comments towards foreign travel and some practical solutions are available to tackle the problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-16 | Tinh Cao Van | 78 | view |
| 2019-02-16 | Tinh Cao Van | 56 | view |
| 2019-02-16 | Tinh Cao Van | 84 | view |
| 2019-02-16 | Tinh Cao Van | 84 | view |
| 2019-02-16 | Tinh Cao Van | 61 | view |
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes. 61
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes? 73
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes? 73
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes 56
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is widely believed that foreign trave...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be agreed upon to solve the altitude. Generally, foreign tourism receive criti...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...but foreigners choose to be ignorant. However, some measures can be taken to a...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that they might want to bear in mind. In conclusion, various reasons cause neg...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69624573379 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94250211144 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679180887372 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5323059086 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.3125 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3125 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170899227986 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488936912862 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503619527227 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10505234441 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203123361636 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.