Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is undeniable that science contributes greatly to the improvement of human society and scientific research facilitates is critical to perpetuating this progress. Therefore, which parties should be responsible for such research has always been widely debated. It is commonly said that this responsibility should rest with the authorities rather than private enterprises. I completely agree with this statement and my reasons will be presented as follows.
The key rationale argument against private funded research is that most companies and firms would prioritize making profits rather than taking citizens’ benefits into consideration. For example, in Vietnam, it is reported that many medical firms have counterfeited the documents about their medicines and sell them at unreasonable prices to those who are in desperate need. In other words, private companies often capitalize on the fruit of science, and therefore products from these entities are often typically unreliable and overpriced. On the other hand, public-funded research is more credible and the authorities also regulate the price in order to make the products equally accessible to the masses.
Moreover, it would sometimes be dangerous to give complete freedom to private entities to carry out research. This is because there is a possibility that they could commit illegal acts, for example, experimenting on humans or doing research on fatal biochemicals and nuclear power. In the worst cases, they could even use those weapons to wage war, leading to nationwide and even worldwide chaos. IS, a terrorist organization, can perfectly exemplify this as they are partially a result of having too much autonomy over scientific research.
In conclusion, it would be unwise to rely on private sector funding for scientific studies. In my opinion, it is advisable that such research should be under the government’s jurisdiction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-18 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-15 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-15 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007
- The charts below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 78
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 78
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59310344828 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06814402023 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624137931034 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6171589085 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.857142857 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263746964152 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851182218525 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538067321356 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15288109643 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033634906892 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.