Many people believe that teachers should take the responsibility for the students to judge what is right and wrong and behave well, while others feel that teacher should only take academic subjects. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
People have different views about the responsibility of teachers for the students’ behaviors. While some people opine that teachers should merely focus on academic subjects, I believe that they should concern both academic performances and conducts of their students.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why teachers should only shoulder responsibility for academic subjects. Firstly, parents play a more important role in nurture their kids’ personality. Because they can understand their offspring well; therefore, the children can be better educated to recognize moral values by their parents. Parents are also more comfortable in imposing harsh punishment on their kids when they have bad manners. Secondly, teachers do not have enough time to keep an eye on each student. Schooltime at large is relatively short, and almost the amount of time is used for teachers to get across academic information. Therefore, it is hard for them to monitor young people’s behaviors. They are also discouraged from punishing students for immoral acts due to the fear of upsetting the students’ parents.
On the other hand, I side with those who believe that teachers also should be in charge of whether the students misbehave or not. Primarily, parents are more and more engaged with their work, so they have a tendency to pay little attention to their children’s conducts. In that case, instead of turning a blind on unacceptable behaviors of their students, the teachers can act as parents’ role to rectify their students’ misconducts so that can be nurtured wholly in both cerebral and academic ability. For example, teachers can inform students of moral principles, enforce the school’s code of conduct and motivate students to become ethical individuals.
In conclusion, it seems to me that teacher play a vital role in raising their students’ academic performance as well as correct misbehaviors.
- Technologies have developed very fast in the past 100 years. However some people think that technological process has brought negative effects on the humanity. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 84
- Nowadays, researching on animal is ubiquitous. While some people says that it brings many benefits for both humans and animals, so we need make the best of it, the opponents disagree with this idea and argue that it is very cruel. Discuss both view and gi 89
- The pie chart below shows the results of survey in which undergraduates and postgraduates were asked about the range of books and non print material in their school library Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make co 63
- The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.The table compares mobile phone 67
- Computer technologies are more accessible and cheaper as the result more adults work at home and children study at home Is this a positive or negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mances and conducts of their students. On the one hand, there are some reasons ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... upsetting the students' parents. On the other hand, I side with those who...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ance as well as correct misbehaviors.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4950166113 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11263236821 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568106312292 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9244823727 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.266666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252497478456 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104443728033 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907874785406 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197620365651 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0990543185384 0.056905535591 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.