Many people believe that university students should study a full range of subjects, instead of some specific subjects.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint?
Some people argue that instead of studying few specific subjects, University students should study a wide range of subjects. Although studying range of subjects will give students vast knowledge of many different fields but they won't be able to gain expertise in one career field they like. This essay will discuss how studying some specific subjects is better for one's career rather than studying many subjects.
It is believed that studying many different subjects will open plethora of different career opportunities for a student, with the knowledge of various streams one can implement them together if required all by herself or himself. Electronic engineers for example nowadays have to learn programming languages, mobile and web development to adapt to fast growing technical era, these topics originally belongs to the computer science stream , if these topics would have been there in their curriculum one may not need to devote extra time and money to learn them. Due to all these reasons many people are inclined towards having full range of subjects in University's courses.
However, many disagree with this fact and want University's degree to be specialized towards one core field. Having in depth knowledge of few core subjects will will give students a head start on their professional career. For instance, many global leading companies require experts in their company for work such as management, hardware and software developing etc. This is where having an expertise will come in handy, most of the times firms will prefer people who have sufficient skills and require no or very less time for training period. All of these reasons give one a huge advantage and counter the fact of learning many subjects for a successful career.
Overall, while studying many subjects in a university education may prove to be helpful in some jobs, person with better understanding of specific work have higher chances of getting their dream job
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-27 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-17 | Qudrat2003 | 56 | view |
| 2020-03-22 | Shuklaksh | 84 | view |
| 2020-03-22 | Shuklaksh | 84 | view |
| 2020-02-16 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 67 | view |
- Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils the petrified remains of ancient organisms ever since the eighteenth century In recent years however the sale of fossils particularly of dinosaurs and other large vertebrates has grown into a big bus 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The extended family grandparents cousins aunts and uncles is less important now than it was in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Some people think because some children find some subjects such as mathematics and philosophy difficult they ought to be optional instead of compulsory To what extent do you agree 82
- As early as the twelfth century A D the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their great houses massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand three or four stories high Archaeologist 80
- tdhb 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ts will give students vast knowledge of many different fields but they wont be able to gain ex...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 366, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ng some specific subjects is better for ones career rather than studying many subjec...
^^^^
Line 2, column 30, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...subjects. It is believed that studying many different subjects will open plethora of differen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 286, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to program', 'to programme'.
Suggestion: to program; to programme
...eers for example nowadays have to learn programming languages, mobile and web development t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 438, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...y belongs to the computer science stream , if these topics would have been there i...
^^
Line 2, column 457, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
...mputer science stream , if these topics would have been there in their curriculum one may not n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun core seems to be countable; consider using: 'few cores'.
Suggestion: few cores
...ore field. Having in depth knowledge of few core subjects will will give students a head...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: will
...in depth knowledge of few core subjects will will give students a head start on their pro...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 502, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... who have sufficient skills and require no or very less time for training period. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, while, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20317460317 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58409862323 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574603174603 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.2619663691 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.583333333 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309650019547 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135505437395 0.084324248473 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0905721854203 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204569802105 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744753451892 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.