Many people prefer to communicate with their online friends than to socialise with people in their local communities. Do you think it's has more advantages or disadvantages.
In these days, online communication has gotten popularity in global village. Certain multitude like to communicate with online friends instead of local friends because of technology. People have many source to communicate like Facebook, Twitter, what'sapp, Instagram and so on. These applications make life convenient but we cannot forget the demerits of that phenomenon.From my prospective, cons are outweigh than pros. This essay will discuss that in subsequent paragraph.
To embark on, there are myriad disadvantages of talking with online friends. First and foremost is that, people meet to fake friends because online friends pretend themselves good and different personality which is very difficult for people to recognise. As a result, they face many obstacles which are created by their new friends. For instance, in online communication fake people make many ID and talk with more than one person and play with other people's emotions then it puts bad effect on second person's life, mental ability and many more.
However, no doubt nowadays, people are very busy owing of this they have no time to communicate with their local friends. As,they prefer to communicate via online in this way they save their time and make new friends in all over the world. Apart from it, when people do communicate with their local friends that time they can see the expressions and feeling of their friends towards themselves and other people because that's a face to face conversation. Consequently, they learn interpersonal skills as well as social skills when they talk with their local friends.
On the other hand,undoubtedly, technology makes life easier rather than past. People can do great chat with their online friends through different types of applications and increase their knowledge because there are many people who belong to different places, religious, experience, talent and so on. Hence, when they use technical gadgets then they become familiar with it and it's a need of hours, people should have knowledge about technology.
In epilogue, although, there are many benefits of online communications but, we can not forget the drawbacks of it. Therefore, people should make balance between online communications and local communication then they can enjoy both benefits together.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-01 | aamna sharma | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-21 | christine112 | 73 | view |
- Some countries have a law to limit working hours for employees. Why? Do positive or negative development. 56
- Many people prefer to communicate with their online friends than to socialise with people in their local communities Do you think it s has more advantages or disadvantages 75
- The chart below shows the amount of money per person per week spent on fast food in Britain. The graph shows the trend in consumption of fast food. 67
- Should children be dealt with an iron hand or should they be give freedom to do almost anything they want? Discuss both views and give your opinion? 56
- Summarie the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun source seems to be countable; consider using: 'many sources'.
Suggestion: many sources
...ends because of technology. People have many source to communicate like Facebook, Twitter, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 371, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: From
... forget the demerits of that phenomenon.From my prospective, cons are outweigh than ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 401, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outweighed'.
Suggestion: outweighed
...henomenon.From my prospective, cons are outweigh than pros. This essay will discuss that...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 389, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun ID seems to be countable; consider using: 'many IDs', 'many ids'.
Suggestion: many IDs; many ids
...n online communication fake people make many ID and talk with more than one person and ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 503, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...tions then it puts bad effect on second persons life, mental ability and many more. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 125, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , they
...communicate with their local friends. As,they prefer to communicate via online in thi...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 420, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...rds themselves and other people because thats a face to face conversation. Consequent...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 18, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , undoubtedly
...r local friends. On the other hand,undoubtedly, technology makes life easier rather th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 379, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...s then they become familiar with it and its a need of hours, people should have kno...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, well, apart from, for instance, no doubt, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1948.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41111111111 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83494507535 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.752597798 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.222222222 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.446015188989 0.244688304435 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143449971447 0.084324248473 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0915722228546 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260903022333 0.151304729494 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693426192212 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.