Many people think modern communication technology is having some negective effects on social relationships. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In such a cutting edge technology, advance in means of technological communication may be attributed to an array of merits. Conversely, numerous people assume that this trending has immensely adverse impacts on social relationships. Although I am in consummate accord with this statement, its merits may not be undeniable.
First and foremost, users can leverage convenience. Thanks to Wi-Fi networks, irrespective of distance, people from the walk of life can get touch with together effortlessly other than meeting face-to-face. For instance, it is clearly illustrated by the event of the Covid-19 Pandemic. Due to social distancing, isolating users contact via modern communication means like Facebook, Instagram and so on, making sure both health and relationships. Secondly, it allows users to boost the circle of friends in no condition. There are no differences between colours of skins, customs. The users break stereotypes about it to make friends.
This trend, however, has negative aspects. Firstly, some miss out on crucial moments of their surrounding people. Spending too much time on caring for virtual friends makes myriad people miss relatives inadvertently. Secondly, it can put an end to some relationships. Due to not having face-to-face meetings, some close relationships like love can effortlessly be in danger of becoming tasteless and even breaking up.
In short, high-tech communication devices impact on social relationships whether detrimentally or well, totally depending on how we take it. Although I partly agree with its detriment, its benefits may not be ignored.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-26 | letrang250191 | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-23 | Haphuong204 | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-10 | Linh Nguyen Phan | 63 | view |
| 2017-06-17 | eyraen | 44 | view |
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005 78
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period
- Look at the chart and discuss the changes in weekly hours of basic housework by married men and married women in the USA between 1976 and 2012 Guess the reasons for the changes
- Some people think that outdoor activities bring beneficial for children s development than playing computer games To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In such a cutting edge technology, advan...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t, its merits may not be undeniable. First and foremost, users can leverage c...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ereotypes about it to make friends. This trend, however, has negative aspect...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ming tasteless and even breaking up. In short, high-tech communication device...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 243.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61316872428 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25462633686 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.687242798354 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3908149338 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.2352941176 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2941176471 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94117647059 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175062867773 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450647619832 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344783557361 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100923733225 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261534090804 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.