Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationships. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Innovative social connective devices has been spreading rapidly. People often argued that such technical development may have detrimental effect on relationship to each other. Although, modern gadgets like mobile phones, computers has indispensable place on our daily lives.In this essay I agree with the statement which is inefficient usage of these devices make harm on public relations.
Young generation is addicted with novel interacting media such as smart phones, tablets and so on. Earlier, people get information about travel and stay back of loved ones only after their arrival or by letters and which is sincerely. Irrespective of easy communication people often used inventive network for misuse the relation by lies and pork pie. For instance, usually students may go out with peers and tells to parents that they are in class room. Overall, invention of modern technology may alter the persons liability to each other and every one can tells fake stories to others without make any doubts.
Intimacy and conviction are corner stone of any relationship if it is social or personal. People often neglect the feelings of others by excessive usage of social media. Such spaces are giving wide range of friends in all over the world indifferent to personal connection. Make use of chatting with unknown friends may inhibit family relations and responsibility towards home and leads to disperse the family members. For example, recent survey report from family relation sites explain that divorce, single parent, orphans has been exaggerated after the arrival of new interaction technology.
Ingenious information technology is good enough how the usage is going through. Irrelevant relations only for time pass would definitely cut off actual relations and youth may grow by excessive prejudice with wreck the nature of friendship with parents and teachers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-26 | letrang250191 | 84 | view |
- Map of a City in 1950 67
- the bar chart below show the percentage of the population aged 65 and over in three countreis in 1980 2000 and prediction for 2030 73
- Nowadays in many countries young people leave rural areas to study or work in cities. Is it a positive or negative development? Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organisation Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 84
- In many parts of the world, children and teenagers are committing more crimes. Why is this happening? How should they be punished? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... indispensable place on our daily lives.In this essay I agree with the statement w...
^^
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t information about travel and stay back of loved ones only after their arrival o...
^^
Line 3, column 511, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...tion of modern technology may alter the persons liability to each other and every one c...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 561, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'tell'
Suggestion: tell
...ability to each other and every one can tells fake stories to others without make any...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y for time pass would definitely cut off actual relations and youth may grow by e...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42465753425 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72421981787 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66095890411 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3458774066 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.6 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.13333333333 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150792707758 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462180002026 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319389550334 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0912674461772 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460656829964 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.